this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
183 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3802 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday reaffirmed its 2022 decision to deny SpaceX satellite internet unit Starlink $885.5 million in rural broadband subsidies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qisope@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Separating Starlink from musk as much as is possible, it's been a great service for me.

My only other option where I live is 20/1 DSL from CenturyLink, a company which, for me, has been far worse to deal with than Xfinity. The 20/1 service wasn't even that fast when tested. If one device in the house managed to get a decent download going, the uplink would saturate and prevent pretty much any other traffic.

Starlink meanwhile has been a huge improvement at 120/10 most of the time for me, and very reliable. I pay $120/month.

There's zero chance any service provider is going to run better corrections out to my neighborhood, the line of sight service options are not in my line of sight, and cell service is a joke.

[–] ReputedlyDeplorable@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

I have had a similar experience. Previously the only thing we had was a AT&T hot spot that got 10/2 in one specific window. Starlink has been a godsend allowing me to work from home. My job for the last two years has been remote tech support for manufacturing, where I have to regularly VPN into customers sites to help them get up and running again. With Starlink we get 140/15 average and only occasional drops during severe storms. But yes Musk is not a good person and we would switch to copper or fiber if it was available.

[–] Darkncoldbard@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wow 120 dollars a month is a pretty hefty price. Didn't know that's what the cost was

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That's literally the exact same amount I'm paying Comcast in suburbia. The speed it a little bit better most of the time but it's not like I can make full use of it.

If you think that price is insane, go check out the price for legacy satellite internet and the speeds/data cap they provide for it.

[–] ripcord@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It's weird. Even in the least densely populated county (and one of the poorest), we were able to get fiber. 50/25 is pretty reasonably priced, and could go up to 250mbps if we wanted for still fairly reasonable.

If they could do it, don't understand why most places -except maybe the most rural western US - can't do the same.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's weird. Even in the least densely populated county (and one of the poorest county), we were able to get fiber.

Just want to say that capitalism is about doing what is most profit able. That does not always mean it has to be the best service or product. This is one such example.