this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
42 points (73.9% liked)

Privacy

39971 readers
139 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Got this from (allegedly) Twitter

So right off the bat I can tell for sure that it ain't me trying to log on to that shite, but it doesn't leave me much choice either now does it?

(red blotches mine, for privacy, and dramatic effect)

(solve the captchas to win a free tshirt!)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 44 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Speaking as a security professional, this is pretty standard practice for a solid user experience. I’m rather surprised someone in a privacy community would take umbrage at this because security and privacy are closely linked. When someone attempts to steal your account, do you not want an alert?

The easiest way to get rid of this email is to delete your Twitter account.

[–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The point of contention here is not that OP doesn't like this kind of verification, but that he believes that Twitter is making up the sign in attempt to get OP to actually log in and report higher usage metrics in Q3.

I don't think OP opposes 2FA, at least not from the info he posted.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's no way a campaign like this is going to growth users use metrics in a significant way to cheat a quarterly report

[–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

I agree, I'm just explaining OP's logic

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)