this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
360 points (96.6% liked)

RPGMemes

14416 readers
755 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 18 points 2 months ago (11 children)

I would go line of fire logic.

You theoretically can not target the wall, but you can target something on the outerside and will then hit the wall instead

[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network 17 points 2 months ago (9 children)

As I have said in another comment, that is RAW not what would happen:

"You can’t even cast it on something behind the wall, because you cannot target something (or someone) with a spell if they are behind total cover. Total cover is created by being behind completely behind an obstacle (like a wall). This counts even if the obstacle is invisible."

Furthermore, because if you chose an invalid target for a spell, you’d still expend the spellslot but there would be no effect. So you actually spend a sixth level spell a lot to achieve nothing."

It’s very much not RAI I'd say and I would likely handle exactly like you described, but the RAW was so wonky that I wanted to make the meme when I found out about it.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess you're talking about 2024 rules? Because old 5e rules are different and don't have this flaw.

[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 months ago

It actually still does, because while disintegrate in 2014 specifically mentions the wall of force, it also specifically mentions how you have to be able to see the target.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)