this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
219 points (97.4% liked)

PC Gaming

12858 readers
1008 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 22 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Why is the steam machine not going to be subject to the same costs? Why then would we believe that valve will just eat that?

[–] MonkeBizNES@lemmy.cafe 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Your intuition is correct that the steam machine will go up in price but I think It'll still have an edge over building your own PC for a couple of reasons:

  1. Valve has economies of scale and can make contracts directly with Dram manufacturers/distributers

  2. The Steam Machine is just already cheaper to make than a pre-built because it has a custom APU (rather than a standalone graphics card). Not to mention running Linux means not having to pay for a windows licence

  3. The Steam Machine only has 16 GB of RAM. Most everyone I know building gaming PCs with DDR5 are using 32 GB

The steam machine is not a cutting edge device, but its lower end capabilities may become normalised if building a new PC becomes cost prohibitive. It may force the whole gaming industry to take a step back for a few years. And I mean, the steam Machine can play Cyberpunk 2077 at 4k 60 fps with FSR upscaling so its got enough performance for lots of consumers

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

The assumption is that Valve made their procurement deals before the sudden price hikes, in which case the costs might actually be sane until the deal runs out and they need to renegotiate prices.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Same as consoles. Sell at a loss to increase game sales and earn more on the backend.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 7 points 16 hours ago

Consoles are completely locked down so there is only one store you can buy from. Consoles are a safer bet that lost hardware sales would lead to making it up on games.

But, Steam Machine is a PC. Not only can you install games from outside the Steam store. You are able to completely replace the OS. You can have a completely Steamless experience on it.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 14 points 20 hours ago

Its not happening. Selling a PC just isn't the same as selling a console that can basically "just" play games.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 10 points 20 hours ago

Steam already rakes in cash due to being in a dominant market position on pc. Selling at a loss doesn't get them much.