this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
228 points (90.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

42184 readers
1450 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Two things:

  1. It wasn't missing on a 90% that was an issue; you could miss shots that showed 100% because it was actually a 99.5% chance and the display number got rounded up.

  2. It still doesn't use real probability. They literally programmed it so anything over 50% was actually a much higher percentage behind the scenes to make you feel like you were doing better (and because computers can't do truely random numbers). This is actually a super common thing in all video games that use percentages or dice rolls. And becsuse it's a computer, if you opened up the code to see the starting seed and all the math applied to it, you could accurately predict everything in the sequence.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

(and because computers can't do truly random numbers)

Ok, well... there are good cryptographic ways of getting psudo-random numbers that are essentially just good as true random numbers.

Also, Intel chips actually do have hardware that uses quantum effects to generate actual random numbers. I'm not sure if AMD is doing the same these days, but I wouldn't be surprised.

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

AMD's supported it since 2015, but it's not something a normal app would use anyway (They'd just ask the OS for it).

More likely for the app to get it wrong though, generating unpredictable random numbers (Which is all you realistically need) is pretty easy, not screwing up and making them more predictable is hard.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Nice, yeah that's basically what I thought.

And yeah, I agree, what you do with those instructions is the tricky part.