this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
104 points (92.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

12645 readers
1931 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 56 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The judge said that the council’s consultation process was lawful, though said some elements “could undoubtedly have been improved upon”. However, he said that the way the council considered input from engagement with the public was unlawful.

Maybe a summery would have been inorder since the title is quite an exaggeration.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago

WDAG had delivered a “detailed” 53-page presentation outlining its concerns about the scheme to a councillor, but Judge Smith said it was not clear whether it was then shared with officers making decisions over the scheme.

He said: “On the evidence, I am forced to conclude that, despite assurances to the contrary given to the claimant, the 53-page presentation did not form part of the council’s considerations in its decision to make the orders.

“It should have done. Its content was highly relevant to the issues being deliberated upon and thus it was a material consideration.

“The failure to have regard to it was a serious failing, rendering the decision to make the orders unlawful.”

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why is all the news from UK sounding like the US suddenly?

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We probably have the most native English-speaking morons than the rest of the world combined. I’d like to think we just gave the world cool movies and blues/soul records but we gave the world a bunch of dumbasses too. It hits England first.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I guess it hits Canada first and England second. And include rap in our contributions to world culture. And jeans and microprocessors and other unimportant shit.

[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

What did the Romans ever do for us?

[–] ProfAel@feddit.org -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, the US only turned out the way it did, because of a bunch of imperialistic European countries (or governments).

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The US has been an independent nation for almost 250 years. At some point they have to start taking responsibility for their own actions

[–] ProfAel@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

Great point. They definitely should take responsibility. I just want to keep the history of imperialism in mind. I don't want to excuse the US at all.

[–] brewery@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

Anything on social media or news gets shared here. Most of our media is biased and owned by the ruling / capitalist class. This is not new at all (see: Brexit and Nigel Farage).

However, in reality there are multiple LTNs across cities in the country, especially in London. They are generally well accepted by local people but they aren't very vocal about it. I think most of the cities have charges to drive in for higher emission cars. They're here to stay but doesn't make a good headline that they continue on.

Even in my heavily pro-car, suburban area, roads are finally being dropped to 20mph and they're introducing school roads / other restrictions. There's long term plans to reduce roads and introduce more cycle lanes (several years behind London Boroughs but going in the right direction...)

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Is the next step "adopt a pothole"? Or cement truck mishap?

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Looks like communities on the streets that got closed off are just asking to be involved in that sort of decision.