this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10142 readers
600 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The benefit could add $200 a month for people struggling. But the UCP government will deduct it from its own support.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Leopards ate their face?

92% of ~~votes cast~~ ridings won in Alberta this past federal election went to conservatives.

And we know that conservatives don't want pharmacare, disability support, aid for the homeless, childcare benefits, or anything else that would make life just slightly more survivable for certain demographics.

edit: for accuracy

[–] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just to be clear, no, 63.5% of Albertan votes in the federal election went to conservatives. I agree with the rest of your statements though.

https://enr.elections.ca/Provinces.aspx?lang=e

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just to be clear, no, 63.5% of Albertan votes in the federal election went to conservatives.

Yes, but since our current elections are based on ridings, conservatives were handed 92% of those seats.

But no matter what metric we go by, we're still talking about a majority of Albertan who chose this.

[–] DarkWinterNights@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You say "yes, but" - your literal statement was:

92% of votes cast in Alberta this past federal election went to conservatives.

Votes cast ≠ ridings won.

Reality is FPTP is cancer.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

My OP has been edited for clarity. There's no need to continue arguing over this point, since we're still talking about the majority of Albertan voters allowing over 90% of their ridings to go to Conservatives.

Reality is FPTP is cancer.

100%

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People with disabilities are a very small minority, and it's impossible to know if they voted conservative. This isn't a leopards eating faces moment, it's a fuck you I've got mine.

Obviously they were already in a shitty situation being disabled in Alberta, but this is just one more sign that Albertans don't care about them.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

People with disabilities are a very small minority,

Stats Canada says that 27% of Albertans over the age of 15 has at least one disability, up over 5% from the previous census data.

That means people voted either against their own interest, or against the interest of someone they likely know or care for. That's as fucked up as it gets.

And this ignores the fact that seniors are also cast aside by conservative governments. Again, voting against your parents or grandparents, aunts or uncles, if not, yourself. Crazy shit.

[–] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Having one disability doesn't mean they are affected by this change. The article says 77,000 people collect disability in Alberta, which is about 1.8% of Albertans.

That said, 27% is a much bigger number than I expected, even for any amount of disability. Do you have a link to that data? I'd be curious to know more about it.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

Having one disability doesn't mean they are affected by this change.

Of course not, but considering that disability can affect anyone at any age, voting against it is self-harm.

The article says 77,000 people collect disability in Alberta, which is about 1.8% of Albertans.

If Alberta is anything like Ontario, then I'll bet my life that far more actually need the support, but the runaround you get in applying for support is often a barrier in and of itself.

It's such a problem that disability lawyers are abound, simply for the application and to manage the work needed to apply and/or reapply if you are denied.

Because if you don't have a family or finend to help advocate for you, there's a good chance you'll give up and suffer in silence.

That said, 27% is a much bigger number than I expected, even for any amount of disability. Do you have a link to that data? I'd be curious to know more about it.

Absolutely. Stats Canada 2022 (released Dec 2023)

As with my point above, I believe the numbers are higher, but actually getting a diagnosis is a barrier for those who need it the most.