this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
152 points (89.2% liked)

Technology

76520 readers
4466 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 62 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Librewolf. You're welcome.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Has anyone figured out how to automate updates on macOS (ew I know, but it's my wife's computer)?

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just use homebrew with quarantine disabled (otherwise homebrew will auto-update the package with quarantine enabled again, even if you installed it without).

I don't like macs. Just have to use one for work.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 1 points 2 weeks ago

Aaah, ok. I read the docs at https://librewolf.net/installation/macos/#homebrew but got scared when I saw "flagged as broken". I'll give it a shot anyway, thanks!

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh that's a fork that's explicitly about having less options for the user then?

[–] berty@feddit.org 51 points 2 weeks ago

So it's just another search engine option, they probably get money for that too. No big deal for me, I don't have to use it if I don't want to.

[–] firepenny@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why does AI need to be shoved into everything, honestly its not AI its just an LLM that summarizes your search, and plays as a yes man.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

It's totally "shoved" when it's just an additional option in the search engine sélection...

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, if this helps fund Firefox and is not too intrusive then I am fine with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sramder@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Because it costs money to add shit nobody wants so we need sponsors, to add more shit nobody wants…

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m not upvoting out of support for this move but to spread awareness

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

Voting is confusing

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Whereas I'm upvoting because I support adding options. If you don't like it, don't use it.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I really don’t know enough about Perplexity AI to have an opinion one way or another, which is why I’m upvoting for awareness. I can’t say whether it’s a good or bad thing, although I’m not optimistic given the general trend of shoehorning “AI” in whether it makes sense or not, but I’m sure there are actually useful applications for the product and a better search engine could be one. I want actual search results, though, not a generated slop answer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] root@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I prefer waterfox but i normally use them booth as they are awesome (one just with the basic addons and the other with all the addons i want but they could break websites)

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How about not adding more AI shit instead?

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

It's just a search engine choice.

I agree with the sentiment, but this is quite possibly the least offensive idea Mozilla has had in a while.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is just a search engine option not some built in AI tool.

No issue here other than fuck AI in general. Just don't use it.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The issue is them adding it to your list without user's input or even notification. This is unpleasant behaviour that shouldn't be normal, even if this time there is no damage.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Firefox adding another search engine choice isn't really headline news to me but cool I guess, especially if it's another option that's not Google?

I'll continue using something else, though.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

You can also manually add or remove search engines (at least in current Mozilla releases)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I get that Mozilla needs to keep the lights on but... yeah.

I've increasingly been meaning to switch to a fork. Anyone aware of a good way to self host a bookmark (and preferably tab) sync?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Resplendent606@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

Another reason not to use vanilla Firefox.

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

pretty easy to just remove it as an option. settings/search/ scroll down to list of search engines, click perplexity, click remove. If enough people do this, maybe they will get the hint.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How do I prevent new antifeatures from being added? How do I even know about the new antifeatures as they are added? Does Mozilla publish an RSS feed of each antifeature like this that they add, that gives a quick explanation of how to undo it?

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

idk if they have an rss or not. I always click the what's new link when they push an upgrade.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Thankfully it's easy to remove yet. But this sneaky automatic addition is still annoying.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 weeks ago

Good to see some diversification away from google.

[–] circledot@feddit.org 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

They should listen to Meredith Whittaker (German) the boss of Signal.

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] circledot@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

I changed it, should work now.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I have no idea why they call it "integration"? It's just a search option like any other search option.
Personally I have 10 search options enabled already, so this is number 11, and if I don't like it, I will just disable it, which is dead easy to do, with a button for the purpose of changing settings right beside the search options.

I tried it for 2 terms I know very well, and the response was very good, but I would never trust an AI response without double checking.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ones that work well take your natural language input, spend time searching and offer results. Not summarize anything. How well does perplexity work in that regard I wonder?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Boooooo. I hope Mozilla is at least getting paid a shit ton of AI money for this.

load more comments
view more: next ›