this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
342 points (98.3% liked)

politics

26330 readers
4167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52742400

How the Senate Democratic leader and his Gang of Eight keep trying to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago

He’s not “trying” — he is caving.

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago

Stop pretending these oligarch lackeys in public office are "caving" or "surrendering" or "giving in".

They are doing what they are paid to do by their donors.

[–] frustrated@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Schumer is part of an old american politics where there was a cordial relationship between both sides and the cost of sacrificing the interests of the constituents was largely negligible - no one knew what was going on so no one could complain (pre-24hr news cycle and pre infinite news outlets online or in public). Times changed. People notice everything. Schumer is not built for this time where everything he does is under a microscope and where consequences are seen and felt. He is acting as if he can just pretend that things are like they were in the 90s where he can show up, gladhand with donors and his colleagues across the isle, cash a check, work 4 months out of the year, and insider trade. He cant. The problem is that he is also intrinsically part of the democratic party machinery so no one can force him out. He needs to be primaried at a minimum.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It might be time to rename the Dems to the Controlled Opposition Party (COP). Seems like a nice counterbalance to the GOP.

[–] slaughterhouse@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

All COPs are bastards!

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Money.

Just a reminder that this past election shows that people are absolutely fed the hell up with the current spinless democratic party. Donate to the progressives, never donate to the DNC and its ilk, and vote for them in the primaries to get these collaborators out of office. The change is happening but like the Beastie Boys say, it takes time to build.

Just hope that these collaborators don't vote to remove the right to vote because I can see them doing this.

[–] atmorous@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Everyone look up and support Run For Something. Their progressive candidates won many elections couple days ago when we won big. Also they have RFS Feel Good weekly updates detailing all they have accomplishments over the years

Research/Volunteer for them and get people you know would be good candidates to them to be trained!!!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

He wants the good old days back, when both parties shared equally in the grift and everyone in the political elite understood what the game was and how to keep it running. Schumer gets that to keep the machine running (that has made them all very wealthy and powerful while working about 85 days a year) he's going to have to go under the boot and take us all with him.

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 112 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wonder if he'll get "primaried". Chuck's definately lost touch with the democratic base. How he handled the NYC mayoral race demonstrated that.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

My pet theory is that Schumer will agree to not run again, and AOC will take over his seat without primary opposition, as long as she promises to not run against Newsom for President.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 70 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AOC will take over his seat without primary opposition

I have bad news for you about how the DNC operates

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean? Making a backroom deal to get the Next One Up across the finish line is exactly how they operate

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

yeah but AOC is someone the public could get behind as a genuine crusader for the small fry.

DNC historically backstabs people like that the hardest, in order to push the totally-not-republican-in-everything-but-name candidate on America.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] smh@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 days ago

My fingers are crossed for a Walz/AOC ticket.

[–] DNS@discuss.online 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I really want AOC as president, but it's already fucking clear with the past 2 women nominees that the USA, despite claiming it is "progressive", will not vote for a woman. Even a white woman couldn't make it, what makes you think a brown one will again?

Only time I see it happening is if there is mass social upheaval, a desire for change like with Obama. Today, the propaganda machine has amplified and division is rooted deeply. We crossed the Rubicon as a nation.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

Hillary had no likeability and Kamala had little time and was courting centrists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I wont vote for him again

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Follow the money. Who owns him? Ask them about the why.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 72 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Weak leadership is why we are in this Trump era in the first place. Leadership comes from the Top down look at how Republicans emulate Trump.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And the Democratic party will only ever allow weak leadership. They complicit, and the sooner people realize it the sooner we can move on from this idiotic two party mentality.

There are good people who have good intentions who run as Democrats, no doubt, but they either get nowhere or they capitulate and give up too much in vain hopes of changing things from within, but the shackles never get loosened.

The Democratic party is in full swing whitewashing war criminals and normalizing boot licking and veteran warship in order to swing the Overton window to the center.

[–] logi@piefed.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

two party mentality.

The two parties are not a "mentality". They're an inescapable consequence of FPTP voting. If you pretend otherwise you will simply lose. And most likely get more fascists.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Stop repeating the propaganda of your two parties like it's gospel, it only keeps them in power.

Both Canada and the United Kingdom use FPTP voting and they have more than two viable parties that regularly win and hold seats. You keep electing fascists-light because fascists-classic is too scary, but you're still voting for fascists.

It was Biden who full throated support for fascist Israel's genocide against the natives they colonize, it was Biden who allowed police to attack peaceful student protestors, it was Biden's press secretary that had police drag reporters out for asking questions, and it was Biden who spread lies and his party that continues to dehumanize Palestinians.

It was Biden that renewed FISA, who signed a bill to block railroad strike, who bypassed Leahy law to transfer arms to Israel, who extended Trump's Title 42, who started the TikTok divestment ban that lead to the purchase everyone is blaming Trump for now. It was under Biden than the US repeatedly vetoed a ceasefire in Gaza, the DHS waived 26 laws to build border wall segments in Texas, and the DOH prosecuted Assange.

You don't fight fascism with fascism.

[–] SupahRevs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I get your point, but the FPTP part of Canadian legislature is the House of Commons and there are only 2 viable parties (outside of Quebec). I think it is clear we need a different voting system to build more political parties in the US, like ranked choice voting.

[–] logi@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

Thankfully I vote in a place without a brain dead voting system, so I have the luxury of voting for who I actually want. It would be great if the US could have that too, but sadly they don't. Once you get to the actual elections there are only 3 choices: the fascists, the limp dicks, or leave the choice to others. However much you dislike Biden, those are the choices. The time to affect what the choices are is before that in primaries and local elections and it takes time and work. A lot of it. It sucks, but that's what it is.

And maybe, just maybe, y'all can do try to do something about that voting system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Forever relegating the party's future is a silly move. There is no viable progressive party. It's been a year since he was elected, there's still no viable progressive party. The best we've done is some well organized protests, but it's the information age, darlings, protests would have to grow to violent mobs before anything is achieved, and I don't see that happening anywhere, even as fascism is abducting citizens off the streets, repelling into their apartments off helicopters.

We don't have years for a party to come together, identify leaders, establish roots at all levels. We are under full attack, now. If we can't get a single violent mob together, then the next best step is to metaphorically do it to the DNC so we can at least use its infrastructure and mechanisms to get a new movement going.

I would love to spend real, thoughtful time devising a new form for a new party, but I am not seeing how, beyond being really upset, people think that's going to simultaneously happen while we get also get the 270 electoral votes behind a single person in just 3 short years, with enough of a charisma lead that the next Jan 6 doesn't turn into a military coup.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Why does Schumer keep trying to cave?"

How will we ever find the answer to this complicated question? I mean, if you just assume that he's compromised trash, and barely better than his GOP colleagues, then everything would be explained, but that obviously can't be the solution.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 37 points 2 days ago (3 children)

barely better than his GOP colleagues

His GOP colleagues are trying to send anyone who's Mexican to a prison camp and make it illegal to oppose them.

Schumer is a bunch of dog shit smirking in a suit all hunched over like Igor, but they're not in the same ballpark in terms of the damage they're doing.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Schumer is a bunch of dog shit smirking in a suit all hunched over like Igor" does not sound like a defense.

Schumer is absolutely a problem to the Democratic party, but he's not MAGA. I'm fairly confident he'd vote to impeach Trump, unlike the Republicans. So he doesn't support Trump, and he doesn't support his fascism (although he does support Netanyahu's genocide, apparently), but he's also not doing much to resist it either. He's very much a status quo conservative. Trump is upsetting that status quo, by making it worse. We also want to upset it, but in the opposite direction.

Schumer finds himself stuck in the middle, trying to balance his allegiance to his corporate masters and Netanyahu with Trump's fascism and the needs of the American people. It's an awkward position to be in, but he chose it himself, and I don't feel sorry for him. I feel sorry for the Democratic Party that's constantly being held back by him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 36 points 2 days ago

Because he's a corrupt piece of shit, owned by the same moneyed interests that own the Republicans.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

His imaginary Republican family told him so.

https://youtu.be/dijMKwZMU2Q

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 22 points 2 days ago
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

He isn't caving... this was planned.

The ratchet keeps turning it all to the MAGA side.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Vote in/ allow to be voted in psychopants and weak willed and you get a crumbling society. It's not complicated.

I'm not sure if you mean psychopaths or sycophants but I'm into this lady mondegreen of yours.

[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

... trying?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Because if they get rid of the filibuster he might have to start doing his job.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

It's Schumer, that's what he does, that's what he's always done.

[–] atmorous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Simple:

In world politics, USA Moderate Democrats are Center-Right on the scale

So they might as well be 2 sides of the same party

Sure there are some good moderates but majority have been failing us for too long.

So look into/research/volunteer for Run For Something. They train Progressive candidates and won many of their elections couple days ago when we won big

They take no AIPAC, & actively make sure their members do not. They are growing nationally their bench & have on Substack RFS Feel Good. Which weekly updates people with accomplishments they have collectively completed over the years

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

He wants to become the head coach of the Washington Generals.

[–] rhurruck@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

SACO == Schumer always chickens out

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Schumer Almost Never Does What I Could Have

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Schumer Pledges Ineffectual Tripe

Schumer Happily Upholds Tradition, Upsets Proletariat

Schumer Chucks Reasonable Option Through Ulterior Motive

Schumer Crumbles Under Minor Bullying Appeasing GOP

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Why Does Water Keep Trying To Flow Downhill?

load more comments
view more: next ›