this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
784 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
3420 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy has once again called for longer working weeks has returned, this time with an emphasis on schedules like the 996-pattern used in parts of China.

Murthy's comments revive a debate which began in 2024, when he argued that Indian employees should work 70 hours a week.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago

The sooner we start eating these motherfuckers the faster things will improve.

Billionaire is a mental illness that isn't compatible with civil society,

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 26 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I don't understand why these assholes insist on people working more hours. What's the difference to them between 1 person working 70 hours a week or 2 people working a combined total of 70 hours if they're both paid the same hourly rate?

[–] rothaine@lemmy.zip 29 points 6 days ago

if they're both paid the same hourly rate?

That's the fun part: you only have to pay them for 40 hours!

[–] Zink@programming.dev 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You just aren't thinking like a billionaire, man. What you do is get the two people anyway, and still force the 70 hour work week.

Your job is not to find a reasonable steady state of operation. Your job is to exploit the resources before you (even the ones with emotions and families) to extract value for the shareholders in the most efficient way possible, before somebody even more evil and clever than you figures out a better way and we direct future fresh meat to his meat grinder instead of yours.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not only is it your job, you're legally required to, and your shareholders can sue you if you don't as per Ford v Dodge

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

He gets less profit this way

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Benefits can be expensive, and they only pay you for the 40 hours because it's a salaried rather than hourly position. They just want free labor at the expense of the employees' sanity.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

Insurance, benefits and labor expenses. Even in places with little worker protections there are costs that scale with the number of workers instead of the number of hours.
A brief look indicates employers in India can expect to budget on the order of 18% of an employees take home per year for those expenses.

There are some circumstances and places in the US where you don't need to provide as many benefits to employees who work below 40 hours. Then you see employers hire more people and schedule them for just under the threshold to give them benefits.

The answer is always because it's cheaper for them somehow.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Overworked peasants have neither the time nor the energy to revolt.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

Iceland made theor 4 day workweek experiment permanent...because it was actually more productive.

They don't even want all the money, they just want us to suffer

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

These people may as well tattoo "slave owner" on their foreheads by now.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You could replace most management people with a rack of GPUs and nobody would notice. Mostly they are a very unimaginative lot parroting the same misguided group think that devalues the employees that create all their companies value. Infosys is a consulting company. They don't make anything or own valuable IP. They pimp out Indian labour to undercut the labour rates and conditions in developed countries which already makes them a shitload of profit.

You would think with increasing options to Indian professionals, their recruitment people would be shitting bricks trying to hire talent with this bullshit out there but they have probably sacked them as well. Though, if I wasn't poor I would probably say all sorts of shit to pump share prices and cash out before the AI bubble bursts.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

So what I'm hearing from that headline alone is that he's a psychopath who doesn't work more than 5 hours a week, and what little """work""" he does consists of getting drunk at lunch and moaning to other CEOs about how lazy his workers are.

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not just saturday morning cartoon villain evil.

It's also incredibly fucking stupid.

Anything that you get better outcomes from by making people work longer, like assembly lines, can be done better by robots anyway, and of course you as capital owner don't have to live life after your dominant hand gets crushed and amputated.

Anything that isn't pure rote work, you get better results when people are not overworked and spending thirty hours a week sticking fucking pencils in your acoustic ceiling because nobody's fucking brain works that long and hard.

Also automation is getting better and better all the damn time. The only reason why we haven't hit 30 hour workweek is due to declining unions and and exploitation politics.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I learned that China had basically made this shit illegal years ago, but work hours in China are still insane. I am willing to bet that they will still have incredible growth and prosperity even if those workhours are strictly enforced.

People like this dipshit need to be stripped of all possessions and wealth and immured alive.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yes they are illegal but companies will use workarounds to get people to put in more time. it's a fake law basically

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I guess even in authoritarian police states where the government will disappear or execute you for any opposition businesses still get away with being assholes.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

if you do business in any authoritarian police state, you will see that laws are arbitrarily enforced. and you will regularly be paying fees that don't exist.

[–] chemicalprophet@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 days ago

Luigi’s work is piling up, isn’t he about to be acquitted?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Well, thank you for the warning. So you are saying people should avoid working for you at any cost.

[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Old hag still at it... Him and his wife are insufferable man

[–] lorski@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago
[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 1 points 6 days ago

Why, so they can write even more shitty software?

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 days ago

Higher taxes on the rich don't go far enough, because they can just leverage their assets to corrupt democracies and roll everything back.

Corporations need to be banned.

load more comments
view more: next ›