this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
708 points (99.0% liked)

politics

29856 readers
2283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 311 points 1 month ago (7 children)

So he is building his own Fuhrer bunker.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 211 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Ah, so the headline is worded wrong.

He's not seething, he's führerious!

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 75 points 1 month ago (3 children)

And we all know what he did last in his bunker

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 70 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 28 points 1 month ago

Made his best artwork ever!

I mean just consider the dedication needed to make a pièce de résistance right as the Red Army is almost at the doors, using nothing but the raw concrete walls of the Führerbunker as canvas, his trusty Walther PPK as brush, and his own grey matter as paint... I'd dare say it's the most consequential piece of art of the 20th and maybe even the 21st century. It's a shame it was destroyed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homes@piefed.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Klear@quokk.au 15 points 1 month ago

I was hoping he'd skip this part and go to the final one directly, but it is a step in the right direction.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's just go ahead and give him that gun with two bullets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redsand@infosec.pub 14 points 1 month ago

Stargate data center. Oracle hardware running Grok to spy on everyone. The White house already has an underground bunker of that sort.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

It's more like a Führer rape dungeon, knowing the Epstein files.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 161 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Sure sounds like someone who is making plans to stay in office past this term.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 48 points 1 month ago

He go in bunker, we weld shut from the outside. Everybody win!

[–] plyth@feddit.org 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Or he is preparing for somebody who is coming after him.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think he deadass plans on holing himself up in a secret bunker and getting McDonald’s delivered every night. I bet his cover story would be something like a secret daily ritual and it wouldn’t even occur to him that the new president might keep in friendly enough contact with previous presidents to compare notes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] modus@lemmy.world 115 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 53 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

God is Dead. USA is a rotting corpse.

Regular people should be taking advantage of the worlds disorder right now. Reclaim humanity.

Billionaires and their companies...

If only Iran would start going after the companies supporting data centers and the tech bro dependencies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago (3 children)

After big tech hurled money at him we should have all automatically assumed there's an underground datacenter in the works there.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 24 points 1 month ago

And the major power upgrades the city is doing, architect change, sponsors, military consultants, footprint, etc...

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I guess I still don't get why a datacenter would make any sense to put there?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 1dalm@lemmy.today 64 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is anyone surprised? I mean, did you guys think it was really a $300 million dollar ballroom?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 172 points 1 month ago

Is anyone surprised?

Yeah, kinda. I assumed it was a $90 million ballroom with the remaining $210 million being funneled to cronies.

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 55 points 1 month ago

I thought he was pocketing it

[–] artyom@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Have you seen the room where he does press conferences?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We figured this out months ago, but the media didn't report it at all. It was never about the ballroom, always the bunker underneath.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

Fuck the new billionairre media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 41 points 1 month ago

The cost keeps increasing. That's hilarious.

But of course he was building a bunker. There's literally no surprises there. It'll be the new den of rape for sure.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This won't be finished in time for him to use it so I guess someone else is pushing for the bunker and they decided to put a ballroom on top to get his approval.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or perhaps the contractors involved are giving him or his associates kickbacks from a construction scam, so, it doesn’t need to be finished ever for him to benefit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

I absolutely would have known nothing about the military complex but for Trump opening his big mouth about it repeatedly.

Knowledgeable people are aware that any construction at the White House also involves fortifications and bunkers.

[–] immobile7801@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I honestly thought there was already a bunker under the WH. Too many movies I guess.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There absolutely is along with some of the best medical facilities in the world and more food and weapons than anywhere else nearby, they just tend to put POTUS on AF1 to stay mobile during duress but that place is a fortress on top of a bunker fortress.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

That's for war, this one is for child rape.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QueenMidna@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not a bunker, it's a data center. Just a hardened one.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Pfff. He would have posted pics of it himself eventually.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least we can hope the nukes won't fly until the bunker is done so we have at least 3-4 years to change something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Probably would've scurried into it when he loses the 2028 run

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good. We can seal the doors, cut the power, and leave him and his cronies to rot in there forever.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Quickly Mr. President, help me bring the guests to your fancy ballroom a cask of amontillado we keep in the secret bunker.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Angrydeuce@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I saw this movie, it was called Civil War and was one of the most genuinely anxiety fueling films Ive seen in recent years.

What kind of American are you?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

America chose fascism. And you're surprised when fascists act like fascists?

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

America is fascism, just ask the indigenous people deprived of their land and life, the piles of dead buffalo slaughtered as part of accomplishing the American genocide, and the dead slaves. This isn't America acting like Nazis, Nazis acted like Americans - Hitler was directly inspired by how we treated migrants at the southern border.

But yeah, while we're on the topic anyway...

The Vorbunker (upper bunker or forward bunker) was an underground concrete structure originally intended to be a temporary air-raid shelter for Adolf Hitler and his guards and servants. It was located behind the large reception hall that was added onto the old Reich Chancellery, in Berlin, Germany, in 1936.

(Note that quote says "located behind", which makes it sound above-ground, but it was an underground bunker).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hey look at that. That one dude that posted the stuff here 6 months ago or so about the designs and plans and mentioned how all of the donors were related to people that are doing underground data centers and stuff like that for Israel are the same group that are working on this with none of the other people that should be involved with ballrooms like Tiffany and stuff like that being associated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bubs12@lemmy.cafe 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Building a bunker at the White House is probably the most useful and appropriate allocations of funds Trump has done.

It’s a low bar, as they say.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Hitler Bunker

load more comments
view more: next ›