this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
740 points (98.6% liked)

politics

29862 readers
2705 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, Clarence Thomas has been showered with gifts. Flights on a billionaire’s private jet, lavish vacations cruising on his superyacht, summer stays at his Adirondacks compound, tuition for a child Thomas was raising, a quarter-million-dollar motorhome a wealthy friend paid for.

Those gifts were income, and income belongs on a tax return. Thomas treated them as nothing, and no public record shows he ever reported a dollar of it. Under Virginia law, leaving income that size off a return, if it was done to cheat the state, is a felony. The evidence is already public, and he could be charged on Monday.

Virginia law makes it a felony to file a state income tax return with a false statement on it, made with intent to defraud the Commonwealth. The statute is Virginia Code section 58.1-348, it carries up to five years in prison per count, and the clock has not run out on the returns Thomas filed for tax years 2020 through 2024. That is the whole case, and unlike everything else, it is a case a county prosecutor in Virginia has the plain authority to bring.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

No, he won't.

Should he? Yes, he should have been dragged out behind the courthouse 20 years. But he's not going to ever face any consequences for betraying this country or for taking bribes, even though he's made a career out of doing both.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 55 minutes ago

We may see a migration of Virginian motorcoaches into Florida and Texas.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 hour ago

Oh no how unfortunate.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] timochka@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's the US - I think we all know the answer.

That country needs to (for so many reasons) drop "In God We Trust" as an official motto - "Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda" seems more apposite.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Fine, but do it in Latin... for the mystique...

[–] Archelon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

𝓟𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓶, 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓶, 𝓓𝓮𝓱𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓶

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 16 points 4 hours ago

Isn't Monday a Federal Holiday? The courts will be closed.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

him and his wife are both hardcore magats, so crucify them

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 hours ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 27 points 8 hours ago (8 children)

Nothing will come of it but it at least sounds funny.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 41 points 10 hours ago

I've got to say it. This is a case the Biden DOJ could have brought too. And Obama. The Democrats have got to stop playing games. They should have immediately changed it up when Obama was denied justice picks.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

how is this guy still employed? honest question - dude has litany of corruption accusations going back decades and he's still holding a position? How does that work?

[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

You obviously don't remember the nomination hearings regarding the coke can. Should have never gotten the job

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The legal system exists to serve these people and attack everybody else.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

and it is absolutely disgusting

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Supreme court justices are appointed for life.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Does that include from behind bars?

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

what can go wrong...

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

NOBODY should be appointed for life. That shit stinks of dictatorship real bad.

What bad could come of letting someone make important decisions, someone who has become deranged as their brain atrophies and also desperate as death looms large, someone with no future and no stake in the consequences of their decisions?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The idea behind the SC being lifetime appointments was to insulate it from political pressure, unlike the president and Congress which are suceptible to removal. The SC is (supposed to be) a rather apolitical body that determines if the laws passed are unconstitutional, in order to preserve basic rights.

Right now, it's rife with partisan hacks, and it need to be removed and rebuilt from the ground up. Absolutely none of the current Republican justices meet the qualifications nor strength of character to be SC jucsticies.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 56 minutes ago

Didn't work. The highest prize for any president is appointing a SCJ from "their side".

Given that a president can serve 8 years, I'd say a fixed term of 16 years so that they can outlast a hostile president. On average a position would come up every couple of years with the current 9 seats.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

and there is no law for the rich

[–] magi093@l.tta.wtf 35 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

To be clear (because it isn't totally obvious from the title and text submitted on Lemmy), this article is a call to action, not reporting on a filing that's actually happened or rumored to be in progress or anything like that:

So why Monday? Because there is nothing special about Monday. It is the next day the courthouse opens, the next day a prosecutor could walk this to a grand jury, the same as they could have on any working day for the last several years. For anyone else, this case would already be filed.

[...]

Three officials can move on this, and they can each do something different, so we ask each one for what they actually have the power to do. [...] Here is where to reach them, by phone or by email.

He could be charged Monday. Or Tuesday. Or he could've been charged last Monday. There's three people in Virginia who have the power to make that happen, you should go call and email them.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 7 points 9 hours ago

Surely it's better to wait until trump is no longer president, otherwise if this forces Thomas to resign trump gets yet another supreme court pick who will be as young as possible to guarantee the court doesn't swing back around for another 40 years

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

this article is a call to action

Action to do what? A People's Arrest?

Let me know when we reconvene the Revolutionary Tribunals. Then write the article

[–] relative_iterator@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They want us to contact the elected officials who can take action. I doubt anything happens but worth a shot.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

contact the elected officials who can take action.

🥴

Yup. Just answering. This whole thing is just a wish though.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

He will not be

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Time to put him behind bars.

[–] Redditmodstouchgrass@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 hours ago

They should lock him in a cabin.

[–] bmebenji@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I’m looking forward to the Supreme Court ruling that a sitting Supreme Court member has “operational immunity” and effectively ruling that anyone on the Supreme Court can break the law as much as they want until their fucking life ~~sentence~~ term is up

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago

And also all supreme court members can't be tax audited. And the creation of a Supreme Slush Fund

[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely nothing will happen.

Best case scenario, the stress pushes a clot into his brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 214 points 21 hours ago (10 children)

I'll believe it when I see it.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›