Coke

joined 1 day ago
[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 minutes ago (1 children)

i mean, if that's the case it sounds like a valid security concern. it doesn't make sense for the US to put themselves at a disadvantage in a potential war. but why would australia not also ban BYD considering they're a US ally? don't they also provide china more manufacturing that can be used in war?

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

just google things that have dropped in price. there's been a few

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

my preference 🤩

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

you haven't really address that the US is already dominated by foreign brands though so it doesn't make sense to exclude china specifically unless there are other reasons beyond just keeping the US companies dominant. TryingToBeGood cited security concerns which i think is probably the more likely reason.

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

capitalism has had some examples of lowering costs in many sectors but also had increasing costs in other sectors. it isn't always an increase though.

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

basically they're going to try to maximize profit so they're going to do a business calculation. if there is a segment of the population, (lets say 30% of people for example) don't order an uber or food delivery because of the costs, and they can cut their costs by 40% per delivery by making cars self driving, they might lower costs for food delivery by $9 to get that 30% of people that are too price sensitive to use their service to become customers. i for one am one of those people that almost NEVER orders food delivery or ubers solely because of the cost. but if it went from $22 to $13 i might consider it. that's just an example and im making up numbers to demonstrate the point. there's always a business calculation when it comes to whether they lower costs or not. sometimes lower cost increases profit. when businesses make a new product or service usually when it's new that service is really expensive, and their main goal is cutting the cost so they can sell to the average consumer and have a huge market share rather than just selling to an elite few.

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

steam machine actually sold well. it's on a waitlist now because of volume of sales despite the high price. i know on reddit there was a big storm about the price, but in the general population people i talked to were really excited about buying a steam machine. a lot of it is more about buying a luxury item, like how people want the latest iphone always when they're expensive and androids are better. valve has that brand name and loyalty.

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

walkabout cities dont really work with big outer neighborhoods and suburbs with single family homes on large plots of land, and those necessitate cars. personally i like living in the suburbs. that being said, if enough people want walkable cities they can build them. i personally prefer 15 minute drives more than 15 minute walks tho, lol.

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

well both can be true at once. a business that hires at $40 per employee with 10 employees is going to have to charge more than a business that hires $20 per employee with 10 employees, but regardless both are gonna to charge whatever is going to maximize their profits

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago (16 children)

Does this have to do with safety regulations or something? Like what is the reasoning behind it? Because I heard these Chinese cars dont have good safety regulations

[–] Coke@lemmy.zip -3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

i mean they're gonna charge whatever makes them the most profit regardless

view more: next ›