TranquilTurbulence

joined 4 months ago
[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 30 minutes ago

So that’s a “yes“. Just as I thought! Although, with a sample size of just one, the result is hardly anecdotal, let alone statistically significant.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Is it because you think the idea is BS and you assume the worst or because you’re not convinced and the idea requires more evidence to back it up?

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

Can’t wait to use phrases like “He was legally stealing a car” or “That guy was legally murdered”.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Depends on the way you define “have to”. If we take the loosest possible definition, as long as literally anything makes you do it, you have to do it. Could be another human, laws of physics or even your own brain doing stuff you don’t want it to do. In that case, I agree with you. However, people usually aren’t that loosey-goosey with their definitions.

Oh, just realized, this definition also encompasses the case where you want to do stuff. It’s all in the same category at this point. People do stuff because they have to.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I was just thinking that there is a third option. You certainly can do things you don’t need to or even d want to.

An extreme example would be all the various kinds of mental issues. Even phobias count. You don’t need to be afraid of balloons, nor do you want to. However, someone suffering from such a phobia just can’t help themselves.

Say hello to the gigaphone. image

Ideally, you need to be a girl under the age of 12 to understand this. However, if you are a parent of at least one such child you might gain this superpower through reverse inheritance.

You could get one of those fancy fake PhD papers printed out for you. It should say you got a degree in flatulometry from the university of Arse, Indonesia. Add more toilet puns just to make sure people stop by and actually read all of it when visiting your office where you have this paper on display.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That’s incredible. Do you have like a PhD in flatulometry?

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The “industrial sulfur” is actually sodium metabisulfite or E223 (preservative). According to the article, the farmers aren’t supposed to use this preservative at all, so there may be some restrictions with this specific berry.

According to this article E223 is GRAS and approved by several food authorities. Obviously, there are restrictions, so you can’t do whatever you want.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Sounds really cool. Let me know how that works out.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Theoretically, that could help a little bit, but it won’t change the fact that the ear canal is only the gateway to the organ where hearing actually takes place. Due to bone conduction, the crunchy noises can take a shortcut and bypass the outer ear completely.

view more: next ›