call_me_xale

joined 1 year ago
[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

Not OP, but coming from the same place: less annoying (I hope!) atheist.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

"Do cheap tickets encourage public transport use?"

What kind of question is that? Obviously they do??

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 39 points 4 weeks ago
[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The charge rate's pretty slow, sure, but the battery isn't very big, so it evens out.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

Related: Alt + ., to cycle through arguments used in previous commands

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Could you uh... elaborate a little?

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

Instant sub, cheers.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Or the original plot of The Matrix, before the studio execs decided audiences were too stupid.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Boy, I sure wish some megacorporation would dump a massive codebase on me to maintain without any financial assistance!"

  • No one, ever
[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This reads like an ad written by an LLM, wtf is it doing here?

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Was not prepared for the Diablo II reference lmao

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 months ago

The "solution" is to curate things, invest massive human resources in it

Hilariously, Google actually used to do this: they had a database called the "knowledge graph" that slowly accumulated verified information and relationships between commonly-queried entities, producing an excellent corpus of reliable, easy-to-find information about a large number of common topics.

Then they decided having people curate things was too expensive and gave up on it.

view more: next ›