mang0

genuinely I think you may be the only one to reach that conclusion

Obviously not. There's me and another. Do you actually read the posts you're responding to?

It's implicit, at the very least not a farfetched interpretation. Although, I don't find the joke to be as controversial.

Identifying a psychological issue involving a person's philosophical intention and the context of linguistical expression is hardly on the same level as the DK effect.

This is about as stupid as claiming you'd need to be educated in psychology to identify a Freudian slip

What makes other animals comparable to humans? If you had to choose between a human and a pet dying, which would it be? Could you go up to a holocaust survivor and with a straight face tell them that their suffering is equally bad to a domesticated cow?

Other animals are lesser than humans. This is why people think self driving cars who have to crash into either a human or an pet should crash into the latter.

Believe it or not, fascism in the human world is generally considered to be more concerning by most people. I sure do wonder why.

"You have to respect the democratic process, otherwise you're literally a terrorist!"

Yes

So they made an intentionally bad chess agent? That also already exists.

People seriously don't see phones in their dreams? Unbelievable.