This is not a free speech issue. The commenter makes a worthwhile point, and your point meanwhile is incorrect. Critique is not the same as reaction.
splinter
Average can also refer to median. It’s a better measure of central tendency than mean in this case.
It’s a tricky to maintain balance between openness to opposing views while avoiding susceptibility to disingenuous “just asking questions” diversion.
Don’t feed the trolls. This is an obvious attempt to divert the conversation.
It took me a second to figure out what you were referring to, but yeah, that’s a case in point.
Yes, and this lawsuit follows a whole series of other actions by the SEC. It may seem like a long time, but due process was followed.
$150 for a meal and five movie tickets doesn’t seem expensive to me. That’s honestly not bad for a meal alone.
This is absolutely spot on.
Exactly this. If you are starting to feel like the world, or a particular people, are excessively negative and hateful, you’re almost certainly spending too much time online.
I’m definitely not doing that. I’m pointing out that the commenter above is correct and you appear to have a misconception about what non-profit means.
You mean 501(c), and distribution of excess profit would at minimum evoke an excise tax and might cause loss of 501(c) status.
This a good reminder that not voting is also a political position.
I think your math is a little bit off though.
There were ~244 million eligible voters in 2024. 75,017,613 voted for Harris*, which gives us ~169 million that allowed this to happen.
*The only other viable candidate, like it or not.