this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
1462 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
5117 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

GEICO, the second-largest vehicle insurance underwriter in the US, has decided it will no longer cover Tesla Cybertrucks. The company is terminating current Cybertruck policies and says the truck “doesn’t meet our underwriting guidelines.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (21 children)

True, but this isn't prose or high literature. What reason do you suggest why "his or her" would be preferable to "their" in this context?

The prescriptivist "It's grammatically incorrect" argument doesn't hold much water when it has been used since middle English.

In a poem, I can see the thought:
"I tried to fit the cadence of this clause
Within the measure of this poem's form
Which has in past and present be the norm
By which this poem, too, seeks to adhere.
This is my authorial choice's cause
for my decision not to use a "their"." But if to find an alternate way to word
Your writing's pronouns strikes you as absurd
I nonetheless opine that you still ought
To make the token effort to include
With "their" all people by the same respect
That you for yourself would from them expect.
Refusing this, I feel, would be quite rude.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (14 children)

Comments here are a short form of writing, therefore people are allowed to phrase things and say things however they would like to. You won't know someone's intent before reading, so the way they write makes a difference.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (13 children)

And which intent would warrant using "he or she" rather than "they"?

[–] JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They felt like it? Their brain worded the thought using "his or her"?

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, of course, nothing wrong there. I'm asking what's wrong with using "they" instead, given that there seems to be some pushback

[–] Warchortle18@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the pushback is coming from that's how the person talk and or wanted to write the sentenc. Why was it so important to you to tell him a different way to write his sentence?

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

I wanted to offer a suggestion I felt is better for two independent reasons. I didn't say "you should have said", simply wrote why I consider the more inclusive they more convenient too.

I don't think there was any active "want" behind that way of writing so much as habit ("how the person talks"). Somehow a lot of people seem bent on opposing that suggestion though, and while I don't want to make assumptions, I'm starting to think it isn't out of some deep disdain for convenience.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)