this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
132 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43338 readers
175 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one pays $61,500...they rent them, but they call it "leasing". It's a mechanism for douchenozzles to drive something they can't afford.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I call it a car subscription, and it's for people who make poor financial decisions. It's better to buy a car you can afford, pay it off, and own it until it becomes unsustainable to keep it running.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Eh... I think it's fine if some people want to subscribe to a car. Some people really like cars, and want to have the newest model. They can lease a car, then return it (lightly) used for someone who is price conscious to get a cheaper car with warranty protection.

I buy old, used, cheap cars because I don't give a flying fuck about what I drive. The cheapest I can get my $/km, while having a reliable vehicle, the better. Sub $10K CAD direct buyer sales are great, for me.

I think it's a waste of money, but I've spent $thousands on my hobbies, so who am I to judge someone else for their hobby spending, assuming they can afford it.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know, I think that a "hobby" should be linked to use or an activity, specifically, not simply ownership. Consumerism for the endorphins isn't really a 'hobby', it's an addiction at best (and I have some personal experience in this area).

If you're renting or leasing cars for a specific use, like racing or camping, I think that's completely defensible; I even think certain vehicles like RVs should probably mainly be rented or leased, to make sense.

But "having the newest car for my ego" isn't a 'hobby' without diluting the meaning to nothingness.

[–] definitemaybe@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, fair. I was more thinking in terms of a neurodivergent special interest, but desired to "hobby" to be more inclusive of neurotypicals.