Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] Without a clear leader in AI do you think the race to AGI will start to get chaotic? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by Ok_Reality2341@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Title really - right now the leader of OpenAI is blurry, which isn’t good for the industry to follow.

We need a strong leader to focus our efforts, but if this isn’t the case - perhaps it’ll get chaotic?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] glitch83@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Controversial opinion: OpenAI never was a leader. Sure it did some cool things but it neither reached AGI nor became profitable. It was doomed to failure from the beginning based on the non-profit's mission.

That being said, I'm still very bearish on AGI in general. I don't think we're as close as we think we are and the chaos is natural since we don't actually know how to get there. Success in AI is an illusion.