this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2026
148 points (99.3% liked)

politics

31582 readers
3111 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a unilateral declaration by the health secretary, several injections promoted by online influencers will become widely available. The F.D.A. had advised against the move.

Archived copy of the article

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You called it gender affirming care. That implies gender dysphoria

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You called it gender affirming care

Yes...

That implies gender dysphoria

No.

Really not complicated

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It does by definition.

Gender-affirming care, as defined by the World Health Organization, includes a range of social, psychological, behavioral, and medical interventions designed to support and affirm an individual’s gender identity when it differs from the sex they were assigned at birth.

It's really not complicated. Hormones being involved don't inherently make it gender affirming care.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So...

When the medical community called any form of lgbtq a mental illness...

You agreed with them?

Because they're doctors?

Just blind obedience and zero thinking on your own behalf?

That must be so relaxing ...

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? Gender affirming care is specifically care for gender dysphoria.

Just because something is tangentially related to gender doesn't make it gender affirming care.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Welp, guess it's time to accept you can't understand this.

Best of luck with your life

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 11 hours ago

They call "incongruence" and "dysphoria" the same thing just a different word despite also saying "words have meaning".

I wouldn't bother.

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip -2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I'm not the one who doesn't understand that words have meanings.

I understand what you're saying, and I'm saying you're objectively wrong