this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
51 points (98.1% liked)
Greentext
7202 readers
628 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I definitely have the unpopular opinion of disagreeing. As much as I'd like to employ manners with my grocery store, if there's no corral within a 30 second walk from me, I don't put the cart back. Most of my purchases are under 8 items and I usually don't use a cart so I just carry everything by hand in the store and out.
My grocery store doesn't care about manners on their end. It treats me like an economic unit and even makes self checkout the most reasonable option. They'd have me clean the floors as part of the checkout if they could. From a utilitarian perspective, it makes more sense for one person to gather all the carts in a batch rather than each individual going back for their individual cart.
The insurance rates thing is a legitimate point ( insurance is a racket, though. Fuck those guys too)
"They don't have good manners, so I won't have good manners" is a terrible way of thinking and living. If everyone did this, it would only take one person to completely eradicate good manners from humanity forever.
Yeah I see your point and I've got amazing manners with human beings. It's a view I personally reserve for companies. And the larger they are, the less I respect them enough to have 'manners' towards them.
Perhaps it's the inability for people to treat corporations the way corporations treat people that leads to such a power differential.
Except that loose carts roll away and get blown by the wind scratching other people's cars. Carts put up on curbs and in gravel etc. ruins the wheels making everyone's experience worse. Carts left in the parking lot block spaces so people can't park in lots that already sometimes are overfilled.
You're not 'sticking it to the man,' the store owner or corporate shareholders who make the rules and set the prices don't care, you're making life worse for your fellow shoppers.
Pretty sure that's not what utilitarianism means lol
Maximizing the utility of labor? I'm alluding to using the components of the scenario in the most efficient way.
How would you express it?
The "utility" of utilitarianism isn't that type of utility. IIRC it generally refers to the idea of maximizing happiness and minimizing harm, with a focus on outcomes of the whole, rather than the individual. Efficiency of labor doesn't explicitly factor into it.
Personally, I think you're just rationalizing being lazy and potentially causing harm to others, which isn't utilitarian at all.