this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
110 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

7188 readers
384 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rocket@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It was a certified cheque. That means the bank has guaranteed that the cheque will clear no matter what. If it were invalidated, the cheque would not clear, violating the guarantee. Cancelling the cheque would call all future guarantees into question.

Given that, the bank was quite willing to issue another cheque. However, they asked that the retiree indemnify the bank for the original cheque should it also get cashed in the future. In other words, if both cheques were cashed, seeing $600k paid out in total, the retiree would be required to pay back $300k of it. The retiree refused.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Ahh, see, this is the kind of thing I figured I was missing. Thanks for the context!

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 7 points 1 year ago

Why was that a certified cheque though? That's literally like sending 300k in cash... by mail.

I typically see those used like when buying a car off Kijiji or Facebook where you can't really trust a random person's check to go through or trust the seller to give you the car when the cheque goes through. Hand over a certified cheque, you're safe to deposit it and hand over the keys.

I don't see how that kind of guarantee was needed to deposit an inheritance cheque. There's plenty of legal ways to approach this if it bounces or whatever.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

If it was ever cashed they were on the hook, sure probably no one would be stupid enough to try and put their name on it - but the retiree reasonably didn't want to imagine the risk given all the trauma