Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[N] OpenAI Announces Leadership Transition, Fires Sam Altman (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by Sm0oth_kriminal@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source: https://openai.com/blog/openai-announces-leadership-transition

Today, it was announced that Sam Altman will no longer be CEO or affiliated with OpenAI due to a lack of “candidness” with the board. This is extremely unexpected as Sam Altman is arguably the most recognizable face of state of the art AI (of course, wouldn’t be possible without great team at OpenAI). Lots of speculation is in the air, but there clearly must have been some good reason to make such a drastic decision.

This may or may not materially affect ML research, but it is plausible that the lack of “candidness” is related to copyright data, or usage of data sources that could land OpenAI in hot water with regulatory scrutiny. Recent lawsuits (https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/writers-suing-openai-fire-back-companys-copyright-defense-2023-09-28/) have raised questions about both the morality and legality of how OpenAI and other research groups train LLMs.

Of course we may never know the true reasons behind this action, but what does this mean for the future of AI?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LtCmdrData@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities.

Normally the board would fire the CEO for dishonesty with just "lost confidence". It would not cause reputational damage, and it would not be legally consequential.

Board must think it's legally important to fire CEO with language that might indicate that Altman has violated his fiduciary duty and they were not aware. Potentially serious reputational or financial damage that Altman should take with him.

[–] toomuchtodotoday@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

https://www.axios.com/2023/11/18/openai-memo-altman-firing-malfeasance-communications-breakdown

Sam Altman's firing as OpenAI CEO was not the result of "malfeasance or anything related to our financial, business, safety, or security/privacy practices" but rather a "breakdown in communications between Sam Altman and the board," per an internal memo from chief operating officer Brad Lightcap seen by Axios.

[–] BrotherGraham@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Didn't Sam say he'll be safe at Big Sur if everything goes to hell due to AI? Perhaps that wasn't exactly what the board wanted to hear.

[–] bluboxsw@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Until proven otherwise I will assume OpenAI was stolen from Sam because it became too valuable too fast.