Rust

Actual programmers using it as a proper tool should produce output indistinguishable from actual programmers not using it at all. That there even is (often) a visible distinction is a big part of the problem.

Notably, it even explicitly says in the proposal that it shouldn't require any policing. Instead, obvious cases are more important.

Yeah, that totally makes sense.

From the policy in the PR:

The policy's guidelines are roughly as follows:

It's fine to use LLMs to answer questions, analyze, distill, refine, check, suggest, review. But not to create.

LLMs work best when used as a tool to write better, not faster.

We carve out a space for "experimentation" to inform future revisions to this policy.

So... No, it isn't.

Note that there are times when using a LLM to create code is allowed. Reading the doc explains the nuance.