this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
493 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2393 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago

So glad this guy has a chance at the white house again.

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He didn't get suicided for nothing!

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 month ago (2 children)

does he even have actual friends? or are they just being used (then cast aside, often under a bus) or people using him.....

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was essentially Epstein's conclusion: he is friendly with people but has no actual friends.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Given his... work, it's no wonder people who "befriended" him would jump ship and abandon him at the first opportunity

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I used to think Giuliani was. They had been around the same social circles, and Trump overlooked a lot of Giuliani's failures during his four years. The collapse of the 2020 election cases seems to have ended that, though.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It wouldn't surprise me if they were more colleagues under Putin than friends, even at the best of times.

Like you'd figure Rudy would have brought more competence to the table if he was just trying to help his friend out. I really got the sense that he was only doing what he did in 20/21 because his back was against the wall and disobeying would have resulted in worse effects than torpedoeing his career and the legal trouble.

And my guess for the consequences would be the release of a video that is similar to his scene in Borat 2, only without Borat rushing in to stop it.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jeff and Don playing “London Bridge” with Ivanka

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Jesus Christ. Someday that woman will be able to speak freely. The things I imagine she’ll say…

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago

You mean when he finally dies and she inevitably releases a tell-all book to capitalize on the opportunity?

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 17 points 1 month ago

Not surprised at all. The Orange Turd is trying to bring everyone down to his terrible level of existence.

[–] notsure@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago

...i have walked through the looking glass.../i wish it were s

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Wait, so the pizzagate/qanon bullshit was just the radical extremist terrorist group that pretends to be a political party - the Republicans - projecting yet AGAIN?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Another hint comes when you really think about why they might oppose sexual education so strongly.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I get the feeling being Trump's closest friend isn't any closer than the person furthest away.

He'd probably sell his family for a buck.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Epstein appears trustworthy on this, for I agree with what he is saying.

If he were saying something I disagree with, I would point out that he's very untrustworthy.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why is there more than 100 hours of recordings with Epstein spilling the beans?

Was it his confession because he knew he was going away forever?

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

From what I've read he was trying to convince the journalist Michael Wolff to write his biography so they spent time together doing these interviews.

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was it Epstein talking to a journalist? I'd take it with a grain of salt.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ugh why would you believe a pedo billionaire asshole? Unless of course i agree with it.

[–] RavenFellBlade@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe because of all of the other indications that suggest there's some truth to it. Like the fact that Trump is one of the people most frequently photographed with Epstein, and the numerous allegations against him that named both Trump and Epstein before Trump was even running for President. Or the fact that Trump said with his own mouth that he would fuck Ivanka if she weren't his own kid, while she was still underage. Where there's smoke, there's usually fire. And there's an awful lot of smoke there.