Programming

28157 readers

282 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

UlrikHD@programming.dev

bugsmith@programming.dev

Spyro@programming.dev

Unethical Ways to Manage Technical Debt (queue.acm.org)

submitted 2 days ago by codeinabox@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

You can ignore it, tie it to unrelated company initiatives, or feign ignorance and simply not offer solutions that add to it. Or… you can adopt more above-board techniques such as Crawl/Walk/Run and the Reverse Farmer’s Rule, which reframe projects so that confronting tech debt is an upfront part of the plan.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Technical debt is very real and can complete fuck companies.

Even though the situation you described is unfortunate, I don't think it has any relationship with the concept of technical debt.

The term "technical debt" conveys the idea that a resource is invested in a way that requires to be repaid later. The whole concept revolves around the idea that taking shortcuts doesn't eliminate the need to actually do the work to make things then right way. Rushing to a deliverable can leave a mess in your wake, but cleaning up that mess is also work that needs to be done and doesn't magically go away.

[–] DementedSociety@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is the VERY CONCEPT of technical debt! Shortcut after shortcut shortcut... The company is literally shortcuts all the way down. No left at the company even knows how to work the erp properly. Because the person who set it up and customized it didn't document or train anyone and then left... Technical debt. How about the mountain of product SKUs that were forced out the door never properly tested, filled with bugs and zero documentation... Left of the next guy... Technical debt. What about all those products not having real assembly or test documents and there being a literal single guy that knows how to test and program everything? No way to pass that info on besides a mountain of manufacturing engineering work? Technical debt.

What are you talking about dude!?!? Lolol.

[–] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No left at the company even knows how to work the erp properly. Because the person who set it up and customized it didn’t document or train anyone and then left…

That's not technical debt. That isn't even the definition of legacy code. That's a mess and a whole set of problems, but technical debt ain't one of it.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

To me it sounds like they took a lot of shortcuts and everyone from the team, barring the last engineer standing, were driven away by the looming Mount Debt