¯_(ツ)_/¯
But honestly, I admire the fact that you care about grammar, spelling, and such. This seems not very rare on Lemmy, but is otherwise a rare sight
¯_(ツ)_/¯
But honestly, I admire the fact that you care about grammar, spelling, and such. This seems not very rare on Lemmy, but is otherwise a rare sight
Of course it is, now fall back in line, citizen!
It's going to be one hell of a mall then
I'm going to park my horse in the office then, good point
I think you should've put TL;DR in the beginning, otherwise it looked like you're arguing cows don't fart, when you were actually about net effect.
I never thought about it from this side, but it makes sense, and seems like another way big corporations fuck the world up.
Got it. I agree that their drivers are (were?) of exemplary bad quality
But I don't think that it is realistically possible to drop all the proprietary firmware blobs, and if it's not maybe it's better to not actively sabotage something to 'avoid those being feasible'?
Or in Puerto Rico, for that matter 🌚
Is there some sort of TL;DR if I don't want to listen to him even for just 10 minutes?
I'm glad you asked, because this is what puzzles me, too
If I understand correctly, each data-access structure represents single workflow, and you may have Transaction in that structure without the need for Arc<Mutex<…>> inside, but maybe you will need to wrap the structure itself with that.
What's the reason to avoid binary blob drivers being feasible? Is that about not being able to use non-free binary blobs in kernel? I don't quite understand what it even is about
I thought Zaktor wrote "I voted for Harris" how's that "held back eir vote"?