sukhmel

joined 1 year ago
[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I thought Zaktor wrote "I voted for Harris" how's that "held back eir vote"?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

¯_(ツ)_/¯

But honestly, I admire the fact that you care about grammar, spelling, and such. This seems not very rare on Lemmy, but is otherwise a rare sight

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 25 points 6 days ago

Of course it is, now fall back in line, citizen!

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

It's going to be one hell of a mall then

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago

I'm going to park my horse in the office then, good point

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think you should've put TL;DR in the beginning, otherwise it looked like you're arguing cows don't fart, when you were actually about net effect.

I never thought about it from this side, but it makes sense, and seems like another way big corporations fuck the world up.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Got it. I agree that their drivers are (were?) of exemplary bad quality

But I don't think that it is realistically possible to drop all the proprietary firmware blobs, and if it's not maybe it's better to not actively sabotage something to 'avoid those being feasible'?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 8 points 1 week ago

Or in Puerto Rico, for that matter 🌚

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Is there some sort of TL;DR if I don't want to listen to him even for just 10 minutes?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I'm glad you asked, because this is what puzzles me, too

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

If I understand correctly, each data-access structure represents single workflow, and you may have Transaction in that structure without the need for Arc<Mutex<…>> inside, but maybe you will need to wrap the structure itself with that.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What's the reason to avoid binary blob drivers being feasible? Is that about not being able to use non-free binary blobs in kernel? I don't quite understand what it even is about

 

I can't seem to find a definition for different kinds of icons Sync uses for special users, e.g. I know how OP and my account are denoted, I have seen bot accounts marked, also I guess that I have seen a mark where a user blocked me.

Is there a place where I can check what each pictogram means and what are the possible ones?

view more: next ›