this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2026
270 points (98.9% liked)
Programmer Humor
33157 readers
530 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

Isn't that part of the problem described in the article? A shallow clone? Github has trouble with exactly that.
Maybe it's time the community stepped in an provided alternative solutions to nixpkgs. We can talk about them here, but in the end somebody has to implement them.
no shallow is
--shallow. the difference is--depthrefers to the history (as reported by, e.g.git log), whereas shallow will only check out the root of the repository and any paths explicitly specified. i guess the article is describing some sort of problem with users who convert their shallow repository to a regular full repo. i wouldn't know a lot about that.This is the documentation from
git clone --helpoh that's my fault. i confused shallow with sparse (
--sparse). my bad.