this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
49 points (94.5% liked)

science

21180 readers
789 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

5% error? A 150 lb human who used a scale that could be 7.5lb off would call that scale useless.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"The camera adds ten pounds" has become a legitimate excuse.

[–] toastus@feddit.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They might.
They might be wrong though since the error is probably not random but relatively consistent.

So it wouldn't be an ideal scale to measure mass, but could still be a useful tool to measure weight gain or loss.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't expect it to be consistent without their saying something about it. It seems difficult. Why not just put a scale in the mouse cage, with a food pellet on it? Mouse climbs onto the scale and you take a reading.