NBA - Main

14 readers

1 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@nba.space

If you replaced Jamal Murray with Trae Young would the Nuggets be better or worse? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by BigDaddyJuno@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

161 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Basically the title. Replace Murray with Trae. Contracts stay the same. Are the Nuggets better or worse now? I’m talking about Trae Young of the Atlanta Hawks by the way

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] itwas20yearsago2day@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Specifically in that system, Trae would be worse simply because he hasn’t shown the ability to move without the ball.

Maybe with Jokic that would change but we haven’t seen him do it, and can only speculate.

But if i’m picking one player to start a franchise, it’s Trae no question for me.

[–] DJBabyB0kCh0y@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I'm a franchise owner and I have to build around Trae Young I'm cashing out

[–] _coed_@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

As opposed to Jamal Murray lol

if murrays the best player on your team you’re fighting for 13th seeds