rglullis

Seeing the instance as infrastructure is what I want to see more of

Yes, exactly! A good manager to me is the one that is just focused on solving the problems that are on the way of the rest of the team.

Host them on your instance, then.

Hummm, gladly?

I'm running more than 15 instances for communities. I was running alien.top which at one point hosted 600k accounts with more than 2M posts + comments, a lot of them being sent to the topic-specific instances. I'm constantly reminding people that the instances are there, and that I can create communities for anyone that need it.

I just checked the first two pages (...) No Twitter thread, no Mastodon thread.

Cherry-picking data points is not the way to make an argument. That just makes you seem clueless and/or biased.

If you really want to refute my statement, you'll need to take a look at all submissions in the past two years and compare the number of posts to twitter vs the number of posts to any Mastodon instance.

I didn’t see a “call for more action” in that comment.

We have someone that wants to post more content and who is being told "don't do that. things here are slow. It's more than enough to have only 5 posts a day, more than that and you are spamming" and I am saying "No, it's not enough. We should be encouraging to have people posting more, not less."

Of course they are, the same way the vast majority of microblog users are still on Twitter compared to Mastodon.

I gave a very specific example to illustrate where Mastodon had become more relevant than Twitter. Again: it's not about absolute numbers.

I reply when I see absolutes such as “all communities on Lemmy are dead”, "all mods are bad ", “all communities are about politics”

1. I didn't make any of these statements
2. There is a big difference between "sweeping generalizations" and "categorically correct statements". The former are the statements you give as examples, but the latter can apply to the absolute majority of cases, even if someone has a data point ("the exception that proves the rule") in the contrary.

It paints the platform in a bad light

Why would you think that?

The original argument was "Communities don't need a lot of posting to survive here", and my response is basically saying "we should strive for more than surviving".

It seems like that instead of focusing on the part where I am calling for more action, you decided to focus on what you perceive as criticism and you try to attack that as soon as possible.

Stop using absolute statements and I’ll stop replying

It feels like your problem is not with the "absolute statements", but that you are doing your best to reject reality.

It doesn't matter if the number is 100% or 99% or 92.376%, what matters is that it has been two years since the Reddit boycott and we still do not have a good example of a thriving community here. We had many attempts (the /r/selfhosted people, the /r/blind), but they are by and large still on Reddit. Can you at least agree to that?

Oh, wow. Thank you for a very good example for self-selection bias!

Seriously, though: why is it that you feel this intense urge to dismiss any and everything I am saying? Don't you think that is a little bit sad that all you can do is this mindless pontification?

However, is giving your credit card or bank transfer information to a website

You are not giving your payment information to the website. You'd be giving to a payment processor, which has to go through all the regulatory oversight. So, yes, I trust Stripe to handle my payment information more than I'd ever trust any random instance admin with my email.

It's still open for registrations. The instance is not just for me.

I did already. The solution is to charge a small payment from every user. I've been saying that for everyone that cares to hear since 2022.

mods and admins only give lip service to dealing with bots

"You get what you pay for.", evidence #103.

What makes you think that captchas are effective against spammers signing up to the service?

You don’t need 5 posts a day for a community to survive here

"Surving" != "Thriving".

A couple of years ago, I noticed that the front page of HackerNews was consistently getting links from Mastodon posts. That was interesting because it showed that at least one significant part of the tech conversation had moved away from Twitter and into the Fediverse.

No such thing has happened for Lemmy. There is no particular community which is thriving. There is no example of subreddit community that had successfully boycotted Reddit and transplanted here. We have the usual handful of posters, each one trying to maintain their communities "alive", but that is far from its true potential.

What's stopping spammers/scammers/bots to do the same thing?