this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2026
480 points (97.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

28985 readers
1769 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How does it not? This isn't a fucking debate. How would artificially bloating the number of tokens they sell not help their bottom line?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because they currently lose money for every token sold. They're operating at a loss to generate a userbase so that they can monetize later. They're currently in the pre-enshittification (I still don't like that word) phase where they want to offer a good product at a loss and lure in customers, not phase 2 where they monetize their userbase.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

and? How do you not understand that more money is better for them even if they're not in the black, yet?

Two things can be true at once.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Creating additional tokens LOSES them money. For a single token, the cost of generating it exceeds the profits.

I genuinely don't understand what would drive someone to be this condescending when you don't even understand the argument I have clearly laid out four times now.

[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you think they don't want people using their product? Are you really that dense?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Are you? Because now we've agreed on every fact to determine my conclusion is correct. Yes they do want people using their product; they want to lure in customers. Wasting tokens generating unhelpful output would both drive customers away with a worse experience, and cost them more money. So there's no reason for them to do that. Like I said in my first post.