this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NFL

51 readers
7 users here now

A place for NFL news, game highlights and everything that excites you about American Football.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] John_Bot@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Idk why this is such a sticking point for people.

They've said the lawyer said it was a problem to try adoption and that the conservatorship was the way to go. Isn't it very possible they heard that then never looked into it further, thinking the guy gave them good info?

It doesn't sound like they've done anything wrong with the money or anything. I'm sure he's been invited to every Christmas, etc.

At what point is the piece of paper important if everything else is above board?

[–] ExtensionDigs@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

BOOOOOO... we don't want your facts when we have arguments based on emotional and biased premises that support our conclusions!!! Get outta here already!

[–] ZombieFish15@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

They've said the lawyer said it was a problem to try adoption and that the conservatorship was the way to go

Because a simple Google search for state laws will tell you otherwise. Because of his age there was no restriction on him being adopted. It was simple paper work that, IIRC, you dont even have to go to a court hearing for. The paper just gets filed and thats that. The conservatorship was actually more of a process that adopting him would have been.

[–] reddit_already@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Or if their main goal was to get him into Ole Miss without triggering NCAA violations, and if consevatorship was both simpler and sufficient, why look any further into adoption? Just do the less complicated thing.