this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
6 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@soccer.forum
rglullis
1
Chelsea FC face new questions over how Roman Abramovich funded success | Roman Abramovich (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by UglyWanKanobi@alien.top to c/main@soccer.forum
117 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rilex1905@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Leverkusen and Wolfsburg have nothing in common with the Red Bull clubs. Those two were founded by factory workers of Bayer and Wolksvagen. This is where they get their name and sponsorship from. And lots of other clubs were formed around factories, as they were meant to provide better conditions for workers before clubs went professional. PSV and Sochaux were formed around Phillips and Peugeot. Red Bull just bought clubs and pumped money into them via nefarious means. Leverkusen and Wolfsburg don't do that and their relations to corporations are historical.

[–] AframFram@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Leverkusen and Wolfsburg don't do that and their relations to corporations are historical.

I was thinking about adding PSV, but compared to Wolfsburg and Leverkusen they are actually liked and supported in their country. The only reason why Bayer and VW get a pass nowadays is because of RB.