Kaidao

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

This is my experience as well. I went back to Arch after trying NixOS for a few weeks. I just ended up spending way too much time tinkering with the system instead of using it. Also, I feel like a major advantage to nixos is only viable if you have multiple machines. I only have a main desktop.

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still don’t see how having the choice is a bad thing. If you don’t like Red Hats position, then don’t use Fedora. For those that believe using Fedora will help better the Open Source ecosystem, they have the ability to do so.

Getting rid of a choice completely because you don’t agree with a position in a nuanced conversation seems childish

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why would this be a good thing at all? One of the main goals of the ecosystem is to have multiple choices, and as others in this thread has mentioned, Fedoras made significant progress for the adoption of Linux as a whole

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 114 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Hilarious that these subscription companies learned nothing from the cable industry that they’re disrupting

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Appreciate it. It sounds like with the new announcement they’re putting quite a bit of support behind it so I’m optimistic improvements are made quickly

 

I’m considering building a new machine soon and was looking at the Intel Arc GPUs as a possibility. Anyone have experience using them in their system? I’m on Arch btw

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Exactly. This is classic strategy for first movers. Once you hold the market, use legislation to dig your moat.

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I was kinda bored for this announcement. I have a M2 Pro MBP for work and I really have no desire to get anything faster.

I was hoping for a new iPad Mini announcement

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago

Lol how insane and out of touch

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I'm in this camp as well - I personally don't think that the Fedora distro will see much of an impact. From what I can tell, it's still in their best interest to ensure that Fedora receives the community support that it always has. That said, like I mentioned in the OP, I get why they made this move for the company.

We'll just have to wait and see whether their Fedora support will continue. The great thing about Linux is the choice, though. So if there ever comes a time where Fedora's no longer pro consumer, there's always Arch and Debian.

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I believe the primary problem (from the community) is that the telemetry was proposed to be default opt-out. Meaning the default choice is opted in.

 

What do you all think of the Red Hat drama a few months ago? I just learned about it and looked into it a bit. I’ve been using Fedora for a while now on my main system, but curious whether you think this will end up affecting it.

My take is that yes, it’s kinda a shitty move to do but I get why RH decided to stop their maintenance given they’re a for profit company.

What do you guys think? Do you still use or would you consider using Fedora?

[–] Kaidao@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is terrible for privacy, but not surprising at all. For enterprise, the target market for Zoom, I imagine this doesn’t matter much.

I don’t know anyone that uses Zoom for personal use. And if you do, why?

view more: next ›