I missed the mark on total number of steam employees by 9. They have 79 employees total for Steam. 71 or 79, it is still an insanely low number
LOL 79 - 71 = 8, not 9. Can't even do basic math on your made up numbers.
null
joined 1 year ago
But do you know what you're laughing at, though?
Well said.
It's not that what he's saying is out-and-out wrong -- it's just not useful or interesting in the context of the discussion.
you can do whatever the hell you want when you buy it
Mmm, not quite.
And I point that out because Lemmy is a very FOSS-friendly place where that sentiment is actually true.
Just so we're clear here -- you pulled your original numbers out of nowhere, but made them oddly specific (71) to give the impression that you were citing an actual source.
That is hilariously pathetic.
And barely even matters since you're ignoring 90% of the comment you replied to (financing and partnerships).
Just really paints a picture of how boring, basic, and uninformed your opinion is, for all the cockiness you came in here with.
You:
Valve had 71 peoples working in their steam division in 2021.
Verge:
as of 2021, Valve employed just 79 people for Steam
Are you done being an idiot?
Not a single one of those links says Valve had 71 people in their Steam division in 2021.
Can't even back your own claims. What a joke.
Edit: HAHAHA you even provided a quote that contradicts the numbers you made up. This has to be a farce.
~~Edit 2: BAHAHAHAHA NOW YOU REMOVED YOUR VERGE QUOTE BECAUSE YOU REALIZED IT PROVED YOU WERE MAKING UP NUMBERS.~~
You are more than welcome to:
- Educate yourself even a little bit
- Leave your asinine takes in your brain
If you want to keep spouting them off, go right ahead. But I'm going to mock you for it.
Plug your ears if you're incapable of upping your game.
Completely ignores financial contributions.
Disingenuous? Dumb? Who knows!?
most of the code was already there
AHAHAHAHAHA every developer in the thread is absolutely cackling at you right now.
Oh look, another boring block of text so you can avoid replying to the commentor who proved you're either dumb or just lying.
We get it, your point can be dumbed down to a mouth-breathing "capitalism bad".
Actually no, but don't let either of you failing to read the article get in the way of making your smug little screed.