Based on how ...certain... Lemmy instances have handled themselves, the intention to deal with "Wikipedia content moderation" here is almost certainly not to make a freer version of Wikipedia, but to make heavily censored content enclaves with the same obvious editorial restrictions concerning certain topics you find on certain large instances.
socsa
joined 1 year ago
WTF now I love Nestle
Nah, they will just get mad and still buy the MacBook because their beliefs are not actually sincere.
Holy shit who gives a fuck
A lot of people on lemmy are just bad at first principles of economics and politics. They don't quite get (as Marx didn't) that the structures of capitalism arise from scarcity and complexity, and that it doesn't matter what you actually call the mediation of scarcity via a monetary proxy - the end results will be largely the same. Which is why the focus needs to be on understanding these complex systems comprehensively and regulating them. Not useless bumper sticker platitudes quietly celebrating even more violence.
Edit - yeah, exactly, there's no bigger threat to outdated ML orthodoxy than a freshman economics textbook
Wait until FOSS nerds learn that the NSA and DoD are some of the top upstream contributors to FOSS projects.
You get to a point where basic needs and standard luxuries don't move the needle and all the things you can't afford are just exponentially more expensive. This phase literally never ends. There are things Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk desire that they cannot afford. But even if you are making like 200k or so, "normal" living cost quickly become trivial, and it becomes about how much you have for crazy vacations and home upgrades. But you can be perfectly happy "just" getting a high end item and not a super lux item if you are a well adjusted person
It's more like money isn't the only part of happiness.
I feel like I might have legitimately helped as well by mocking them incessantly for being campists and not socialists
view more: next ›
I mean we have seen how the Lemmy devs approach certain topics, and it is definitely not with a preference for openness or free exchange of ideas. There are certain topics here which have a hair trigger for content removal and bans, for extremely petty and minor "transgressions," so the motivation here seems pretty transparent.