this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2026
133 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

16718 readers
881 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Checks out, really.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

IQ is not an objective measure of intelligence. Nothing can be because intelligence is colloquial and subjective. If I told you that I had an instrument that could objectively rank all humanity by beauty, smart people would see the problem immediately.

IQ depends on their being one kind of underlying intelligence. No such thing as 'book smarts' or 'street smarts'. Emotional intelligence is also fake. Just logical problem solving and spacial recognition.

IQ is racist. IQ consistently shows that black Americans have lower IQ than other groups. White supremacists love this fact because they view it as scientific evidence that black people are inferior.

"Race" is biologically incoherent, but "black American" is the most incoherent of all. Barack Obama is a famous black American. But his mama is a white lady named Durham and her people are British. In the Jim Crow era South, 1/16 black ancestry made you 100% legally black. That's one great-grandparent. White and black Americans have been cross pollinating for 400years. Sometimes even consensually.

"Black American" is not a coherent biological category. Therefore, when IQ tests mark differences between these groups, it can ONLY be measuring social difference because their is no biological explanation.

IQ is not an objective measure of intelligence and any study based on it is faulty.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

IQ is a reasonably effective metric of certain kinds of intelligence. It doesn't measure all intelligence and has some caveats, but it still highly correlates with certain abilities of one's brain. IQ decreasing over time in the same subject is a cause for alarm.

And you absolutely can objectively measure certain types of beauty. If you managed to rank all of humanity by facial symmetry, I'd think you were a bit weird, but I wouldn't say that you were wrong.

[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The original article wasn't talking about IQ at all - Reader's Digest was oversimplifying the research.

Cognitive tests included prospective memory (baseline only: n = 171,585), visual-spatial memory (round 1: n = 483,832; round 2: n = 482,762), fluid intelligence (n = 165,492), and short-term numeric memory (n = 50,370).