grue

You are off by many orders of magnitude.

This is kinda a loose fit for this community because it only really concerns cars in the sense that they're an important class of consumer good that can force behavior because they're hard/expensive to replace... but as a GrapheneOS user and owner of a[n old, unconnected] VW, I'll allow it because fuuuuuuck VW.

Sure, but somebody else already mentioned Mel Brooks films in general. I wanted to highlight that one uniquely because of the factor I mentioned.

Blazing Saddles, especially since, as they say, you couldn't make it today. 'Course, now that's less because you can't say the n-word and more because all the anti-racism would trigger the MAGA CHUDs.

You misread the other guy, too.

Boxfish have a surprisingly low coefficient of drag, so much so that Mercedes made a concept car inspired by them.

The article does not specify who can be held legally responsible for this violation or if the prison itself was already held responsible.

That's because the answer is now "nobody."

Only if by "cop" you mean "subhuman gestapo thug about to murder people for exercising their free speech rights."

The guy who shot the gun might be an exception because only a crazy person is firing guns off at other humans like this

Only a crazy person shoots a gestapo thug in defense of others? (According to the article, the thug had his gun drawn and was about to start shooting protestors.)

I'm not sure anybody really cares about the streaming codec as long as it works with good quality.

But fair enough: I agree it would be nice to have a "Steam Link 2" that could do 4K60 (or better) and (as pointed out in a Machine review video I just watched) support HDMI CEC.

(Maybe some third-party company should do it and name it the "Missing Link," LOL)

Hope is nice, but realistically the difference in urgency is intentional ratfucking.

Full disclaimer: While I think the above reasoning is sound, I think we should be very careful regarding how unauthorised cleaning operations are punished. For example, it seems absurd to me to give jail time for it. When the person in question is obviously acting with good intentions, it's much more reasonable to sentence them to take some course where they can learn about why what they were doing was potentially harmful, and perhaps sentence them to community service working on some authorised project. That way, you help them learn, let them work on something they want to contribute to, and get more resources for the authorised projects.

I feel like the punishment should depend on whether they did it competently or not. You should definitely get punished for screwing up even with good intentions, but if you actually are good enough to know what you're doing, you should get away with a relative slap on the wrist.