grue

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Before you can punish for using LLMs, you need to be able to reliably detect the use of LLMs, including guarding against false positives.

You can tell they're using an LLM if they have a computer out during the pen-and-paper test.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago
[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 15 hours ago

"Mildly" only because I'm pretty sure it's already illegal. Still, fucking absurd that they even have the gall to try.

 
[–] grue@lemmy.world 23 points 15 hours ago

He should unionize the staff before he leaves.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

IIRC it would start to break if you made it too big in the previous game (and I'm not talking about the strength reinforcement at depth mechanic; I'm talking about Youtubers like Let's Game It Out building a tube halfway across the map).

I myself had a base that reached from the surface biome down into the jellyshroom cave, and another on the island with a ladder from the beach to the summit.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

How old counts as "classic?" I've been using plain ol' "up to 10%" in my '90...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 54 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (22 children)

As much as I LOL'd and agree with the sentiment, this is almost entirely about politics, not infrastructure -- the only tenuous connection is that the political shithead happens to own a car company. As such, please try to resist the temptation to post more stuff like this here.


Edit to address some feedback:

Yes, !fuckcars is political, but that doesn't mean everything political is on-topic. If this had been about Musk interfering with CA high-speed rail, it would be unambiguously on-topic. If this had been about the harmful effects of those trucks on other road users, it would be unambiguously on-topic (although for the record, I dislike threads hating on any one particular type of car because they risk missing the point that all of them contribute to most of the problems).

But it was neither of those things. It was just pointing out the dishonesty of people who bought a particular product with a particular political connotation. The fact that the product happened to be a vehicle was irrelevant to the idea being conveyed. That makes it a good fit for somewhere like !politicalmemes or !enoughmuskspam, maybe, but not here.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And as part of the “open” part, any data added must be compatible with the odbl license, which means sources must first be verified as compatible, so any imports of government databases are oftentimes simply not legally possible and even if they are it’s something you have to do quasi-manually since it’s probably in a completely different format.

Considering that collections of facts aren't actually copyrightable in the first place (see Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.), how much does that actually matter?

Like, as a practical matter I can see how the people that run OpenStreetMap might not want you to do it, but I don't think it would actually be copyright infringement if somebody, say, scraped the business directory information from Google Maps and bulk-imported it to OpenStreetMap.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A lot of the people in my neighborhood are actually pretty friendly, in an idealized-small-town sort of way. But I live in one of those "scary" "inner-city" neighborhoods with The Blacks™ and The Gays™ and whatnot, so it's a little different for me.

Meanwhile, my Boomer parents, who live out in the suburbs, complain that their subdivision has gone completely to Hell. Funny, that.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you? Or do you remember when they falsely claimed to mind their own goddamn business?

[–] grue@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, you sure sound upset, and you're downvoting both me and the other guy who replied to you, so...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I buy used/refurbished phones a generation or so out-of-date, and recently upgraded from a Pixel 7 to a Pixel 8. Amazon sells "unlocked" phones, but does not distinguish between carrier-unlocked and OEM (bootloader)-unlocked. Whatever phone you get, you'll want to immediately do the "enabling OEM unlocking" step (enable Developer Options and make sure that "OEM unlocking" exists as an option and isn't grayed out) before the return period expires.

It took me two tries to get an actually-unlockable phone this time around, and I've still got the unsuitable one sitting here on my desk waiting to get packed and shipped back to Amazon.

Also, I've been actually screwed by it a year or so ago, when I got a Pixel 7 for my dad, with the idea of preserving the option to install something like GrapheneOS or LineageOS at a later date. When that later date came (after the return window had closed), we discovered that his "unlocked" phone wasn't actually OEM-unlockable and now he's stuck on the stock ROM.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/46763057

Hopefully my neighbors will rejoice as I no longer have to cut and drill steel.

My next goal is to find another junk trailer so I can get the wheels more centered and have better handling and keep the rear of the trailer from scraping when going up and down driveways.

 

Youtube link, in case you don't like PeerTube for some reason: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCs5nDEZpoM

 

Blog post, if you'd rather read text than watch video: https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/bambu-lab-abusing-open-source-social-contract/

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/42401743

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/63873581

view more: next ›