People Twitter

5222 readers

2266 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

340

Win? Move further right. Lose? Move further right. (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

On one hand, I get it. On the other hand, the other choice is orders of magnitudes worse in every category.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

the other choice is orders of magnitudes worse

Both can be true.

The other side being worse doesn't necessarily motivate your base to support you, you need to actually motivate them to get out and vote. It also doesn't necessarily motivate people on the fence either. If you aren't an attractive candidate, you can't rely on the unattractiveness of your competitor to win you the election.

It seemed the DNC banked on the public caring that Harris is a woman of color and popular among celebrities, and I doubt the public particularly cares about any of that. Her policies were weak and she came off as not really having a plan, or in other words, riding on Biden's coattails. That's not a compelling argument...

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Plus Biden had many of the same issues as Harris when he ran... he didn't even want to run. The DNC dragged him out of retirement. I think after the Hillary and Harris data it's become pretty clear a woman is not becoming president any time soon... not even sure if one could win the primary in the next 8 years after the trauma of this election.