this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
604 points (98.9% liked)

politics

31320 readers
2811 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk, after spending $21 million backing conservative Brad Schimel in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race, amplified election fraud claims following Schimel’s loss to liberal judge Susan Crawford.

Musk boosted a post by Alex Jones featuring Roger Stone, who alleged mail-in vote fraud. Schimel rejected the claims, urging supporters to accept the results.

Musk pivoted to highlighting a voter ID ballot measure, though Wisconsin already requires ID. Critics see his reaction as echoing Trump-era denialism.

Despite GOP pressure, Schimel’s concession stood out for its rare break from MAGA conspiracy rhetoric.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I want to know why anyone still uses that shitty Nazi site he bought.

[–] FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Unfortunately, the art community is still big. No other platform has as much engagement with small time artists. I use it just for that. Sometimes Ill get curious and see political tweets. They're almost always filled to the brim with comments spouting: hate, disinformation or deflection. You'll see sane comments but the algorithm buries them. I'm sure most are bots but the nazi-ism is definitely boosted.

I've made accounts on bsky, pixelfed and cara and post there also. Unfortunately the masses haven't moved to those yet so commissions and posts are sparse.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Twitter overtook deviant art?

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

Would be interesting if everyone still stuck using it consistently advertised a discount for finding them on any site besides Twitter. Might not make the biggest difference by itself but it could start a trickle that turns into the flood.

Basically a surcharge for users that only know Twitter or otherwise wouldn't be bothered by the noise. Maybe call it a tarrif that can be easily avoided :)

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because it’s the site where you can follow and interact with the most people.

[–] TemplaerDude@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No one in their right mind should want to interact with the nazi-loving scum on that shit hole.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's almost as if there are many different people on that website.

[–] TemplaerDude@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

And if they're still on there they're supporting a Nazi shit head. People need to migrate their communities. Stop being lazy. Stop being part of the problem. Get off the nazi website

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I actually looked up the people I follow on X on other platforms such as Mastodon & Bluesky, I found 0 on Mastodon and 3 on Bluesky...

[–] griefreeze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who/what do you follow that is worth supporting the app? I have never used Twitter/x, I'm genuinely curious

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A few examples include Drop Site, Aymeric Canon, Mary Kostakidis, Bruno Tertrais, Marco Botenga MEP, Régis Le Sommier, Dr Jimmy Mohamed, Ian Caroll, Rachel Blevins, Scott Ritter, Trita Parsi, Kenneth Roth, Dominique De Villepin...

[–] griefreeze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing! If those are really important to you, you're in a bit of a pickle that I don't envy.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Many people, especially on Lemmy, pretend to live extremely virtuously. The reality is we each make some compromises in our lives.

[–] griefreeze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh yeah absolutely, I hope you don't think I was passing any judgement

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, I didn’t think you were passing judgement, and I appreciate your balanced take. I was referring to other people.

[–] griefreeze@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ok cool. Yeah sometimes I wish I could see only black and white, seems like an easy way to live.

[–] dnick@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Another way to look at it is like having to use Windows because that's what they use at your job. There's a problem but because most people are oblivious or don't care, the momentum is difficult to escape. You may find it easy to say 'quit you job then' to fully show your disapproval but not everyone has that luxury.

I do hope everyone that is stuck using it mentions in every commission or interaction that they are available on different sites as well though.

Anyone still using it or of convenience though should quit immediately.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And its a shitty thing for each of them to use the website.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

You're entitled to your opinions.

[–] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You spelled bots wrong homie.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure, there are bots. There are also a lot of real people, politicians, journalists, analysts, software engineers etc.

I actually tried to replace X a few weeks ago and considered Mastodon and Bluesky. Nobody I follow on X is on Mastodon, and only three are on Bluesky.

[–] SovsensMester@feddit.dk 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Go outside? I have never used Twitter and live a perfectly normal life. I have access to plenty of information and opinions from paid subscriptions to newspapers and personal blogs. No one can communicate anything serious on Twitter. For sport highlights or similar - I get it. For anything else - a social tool - people have simply forgotten to go outside and do real stuff with real people. You are lying to yourself by saying Twitter provides something you can't live without.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You answer to finding a platform that provides most of the information I want to have is to ... go outside? Do you think that's even remotely helpful?

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dont be lazy and find it elsewhere? I didnt realize twitter was where all new things come from.

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I'm guessing you didn't read my comment two steps above...