this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
39 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13279 readers
4 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

In my experiments I’ve found that the most rigid thinkers have genetic dispositions related to how dopamine is distributed in their brains.

Rigid thinkers tend to have lower levels of dopamine in their prefrontal cortex and higher levels of dopamine in their striatum, a key midbrain structure in our reward system that controls our rapid instincts. So our psychological vulnerabilities to rigid ideologies may be grounded in biological differences.

In fact, we find that people with different ideologies have differences in the physical structure and function of their brains. This is especially pronounced in brain networks responsible for reward, emotion processing, and monitoring when we make errors.

For instance, the size of our amygdala — the almond-shaped structure that governs the processing of emotions, especially negatively tinged emotions such as fear, anger, disgust, danger and threat — is linked to whether we hold more conservative ideologies that justify traditions and the status quo.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Pretty sure the field of political science is not moral relativism

[–] VagueAnodyneComments@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Moral relativism is, in fact, pretty closely related to Political science, which is a field of sociology for which the "science" part is a moniker.

Also I didn't mention Political science.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The ideological brain

In political science, a political ideology is a certain ethical set of ideals, principles, doctrines, myths, or symbols of a social movement, institution, class, or large group that explains how society should work, offering some political and cultural blueprint for a certain social order.

Saying political science and sociology aren't real science is silly.

I'm open to a definition of science broad enough to include sociology, but political science is a philosophy. Really don't think this is an assailable position if we are dealing in popular fact.