this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)

Flippanarchy

944 readers
1454 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

this is such a loser-pilled meme I think its a work and maybe OP is compromised

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

In my area, the social structures to constructively or destructively use violence are missing; leaving only a small minority of people looking for a fight. And often they fail to meet up with others looking also for a fight: leading to quiet nights of introspection.

And I don’t think this is going to change. Which is going to frustrate a lot of people up and down the political spectrum. At the same time I think that this is for the good. It keeps people safe

Anyone remember how the Syrian civil war started ? Most of the idealistic people who liked fighting were gone after a few months.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Basically a neurological take on the age old "the ends can never justify the means" take.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

??? This is about targeting the correct audience instead of what's easy.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

??? It seems we do not understand each other at all.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But "make sure your motivation is to help the system" isn't related to "the ends justify the means" at all.

The OP is claiming that if done correctly, the ends justify the means.

I'm not criticizing your idea that the ends don't justify the means. It's only that your reply is a non sequitur to the OP.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, my understanding on the OPs text is that the means necessarily shape the ends, but instead of a sociological interpretation, it is an equally valid neurological one.

And this is in turn the exact same argument as that the ends should never justify the means, because if you use the wrong means you will never reach the ends you want.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The OP states it is justified to use violence against the right people to achieve your ends.

"The ends never justify the means." is a statement that violence is never the right answer.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

Hmm, no? Where does the OP say that?