this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
249 points (93.4% liked)

News

23301 readers
4235 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] protist@mander.xyz 96 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The stock market has been decoupled from the real economy for years. There are interests who want all of us to make sacrifices when the stock market goes down, but I don't agree with them.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah they are always warning about the stock market and what we need to do to make it go up but most people don't even own stock. Maybe in their 401k if they have one. Other than that the average person probably doesn't care. I hardly even look at my 401k either. Let it tank I don't care. I'll probably work until I die anyways.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The point is other than real estate the 401k is all the middle class has for wealth.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago

Honestly, these researchers could have saved themselves some work and simply looked at the current income disparity to come to the same conclusion ...

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've lived through a whole dark age and three supposed end of days with the stock market.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was working with Lehman Brothers when they went bankrupt.

Watching the collapse of a major investment bank from the inside is an interesting experience.

Still have one of their plexiglass desk cubes listing "Our values", which always brings an ironic smile to my face whenever I see it.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It didn't really collapse. Your CEO walked out the door with over 600 million dollars for a single year of work.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both things can be true at the same time.

Also we wasn't "my" CEO as I was a freelancer working with them, not an employee, and even if I had been the latter it would still not have been "my" CEO because Lehman wasn't some kind of cooperative were workers got to chose upper management.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No they can't both be true. Companies that collapse do not have literal billions to give away. Corporate bankruptcy is not the same as personal bankruptcy. Personal bankruptcy you are going to spend the next 8 years eating ramen. Corporate bankruptcy is more like "I don't think I should have to work anymore but should still have money".

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's how it should be, not how it is.

Most institutions that go bankrupt have lots of assets, it's just that they have even more debts, and debt has various levels of seniority with the most senior debt payed first from whatever assets the company has, then if any assets are left the next more senior debt paid from them and so on until there are no more assets, and whomever was holding the more junior debt gets nothing (and stockholders are even more junior than any debt, so they usally get nothing).

There are tons of ways to take advantage of such a system (this being the fishy part) some of which are legal (so, even more fishy), and this being a large financial institution (who generally specialize in exactly playing the money game, including tax evasion, avoidance and all sorts of shennenigans) I'm almost sure the compensation for the CEO was made to be senior enough in the debt heirarchy that it ended up high enough that there was still money left from the sale of the company's assets after covering any debt that was even senior to it, to pay for it.

The Finance Industry is a complete total swamp, a politically endorsed swamp even, which is partly why I'm not working in the Industry anymore.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that the one where the values were on the other side of a Venn diagram without anything in the overlap?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Bunch of text with even a Mission Statement on one side of the cube.

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair."

- A Tale of Two Cities

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would be really worried about that if I were in the investor class. Then again, I wouldn't like myself very much, so I'm glad I'm not.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're never worried. An economic downturn is just an opportunity to them.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what's the worst that can happen to them? "Oh no, instead of having 2 villas I will only be left with 1?"

Chances are they already can choose to not work for the rest of their lives. They will never get into a worse position than the average worker already is in.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What op meant by the downturn being an opportunity is that their cash reserves get used to buy up whatever depressed item exists. Land, buildings, etc.

They aren’t weathering the storm like most, they are buying all the abandoned boats.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know, I was furthering the point. Even if they "lose", they don't lose.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Gotcha. They’ll have three villas though.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If there are two classes which are top priority for "rescuing" with public money, is Financiers and Wealthy Investors.

It's the small fry that needs to worry, as invariably they're the ones left holding the bag whenever a way overstreched Economy and associated La-la-Land of Rainbows & Ponies Stockmarket finally get pulled back by the reality that there is nowhere near enough real value in total to justifiy the total value implied by all those sky-high asset prices.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So many people's retirements are in the stock market. This would screw over a ton of the working class too.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It did to me, because I have a locked-in pension from a former union job and after I quit I transferred it to my bank ... who proceeded to tell me I had no choice but to put it into stocks. As of rn it's finally back up to what I had in 2008.

I fucking hate the stock market.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Would a crash lower house prices?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but you won't be able to buy any. Hedge funds will hoover up all of the freed inventory faster than retail buyers can.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then we nationalize the hedge funds and seize their property through eminent domain. Fuck their economy.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They own the politicians, bruh.

Not if we buy them first!

Oh, wait. Damn.

[–] Danksy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you plan on that happening?

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Take power and use it.

No need to get into specifics at this point.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Depending on why it crashed, it might in some areas to some extent. It might also motivate a drop in rates which could cause prices to start spiking upwards. The biggest issue with house prices is supply has been constrained since the GFC, there hasn't been enough housing built to meet demand. Until that changes I wouldn't expect house prices to ever decline significantly or over a sustained period of time.

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this last sugar rush was nuts, I'm still bearish but refuse to play anything. S&P chart looks like a meme stock.

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Is it edging before bed or ?