this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
102 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37719 readers
279 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

See also twitter:

We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam Altman to return to OpenAI as CEO with a new initial board of Bret Taylor (Chair), Larry Summers, and Adam D'Angelo.

We are collaborating to figure out the details. Thank you so much for your patience through this.

Seems like the person running the simulation had enough and loaded the earlier quicksave.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cwagner@beehaw.org 5 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Eh, not sure I agree. Seems to also have been between too little and too much AI safety, and I strongly feel like there’s already too much AI safety.

[–] los_chill@programming.dev 42 points 11 months ago (8 children)

What indications do you see of "too much AI safety?" I am struggling to see any meaningful, legally robust, or otherwise cohesive AI safety whatsoever.

[–] cwagner@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

Using it and getting told that you need to ask the Fish for consent before using it as a flesh light.

And that is with a system prompt full of telling the bot that it’s all fantasy.

edit: And "legal" is not relevant when talking about what OpenAI specifically does for AI safety for their models.

[–] trainden@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I really hope Fish was just a typo there

[–] cwagner@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Nope

Best results so far were with a pie where it just warned about possibly burning yourself.

[–] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

...So your metric of "too much AI safety" is that it won't let you fuck the fish...?

boykisser meme saying "I ain't even got a meme for this bro what the fuck"

[–] cwagner@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No, it’s "the user is able to control what the AI does", the fish is just a very clear and easy example of that. And the big corporations are all moving away from user control, there was even a big article about how I think the MS AI was broken because… you could circumvent the built-in guardrails. Maybe you and the others here want to live in an Apple walled garden corporate controlled world of AI. I don’t.

Edit: Maybe this is not clear for everyone, but if you think a bit further, imagine you have an AI in your RPG, like Tyranny, where you play a bad guy. You can’t use the AI for anything slavery related, because Slavery bad, mmkay? And AI safety says there’s no such thing as fantasy.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)