this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
634 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
4213 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 226 points 1 year ago (100 children)

Sorry Google.

I'm gonna use YouTube ad free or I won't use it.

And I ain't gonna pay for it.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago (60 children)

Asking genuinely, if you were in charge of YouTube, and you don't think anyone should pay for YouTube, and you don't think you should run ads, how exactly would you go about paying for the massive amount of engineers and infrastructure needed to keep the lights on?

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Honestly?

Not my monkeys, not my circus.

I don't care what YouTube wants to do or how they do it, they need viewers and if they can't figure out how to keep em, ah well. They gotta create a service that caters to my behavior, not the other way around.

[–] deranger@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s a flippant response when you were asked specifically to pretend they were your monkeys.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well, actually, they have to create a service that caters to people who bring them revenue. If that isn't you, they don't have to, and actively shouldn't, cater to you at all.

You're just saying "I don't have an actual answer" in a roundabout way.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Well, I don't, but it isn't my problem.

Google makes enough money as is, I don't really care if the make poor decisions and end up with an unviable business model. I'll do other things with my time.

I don't really care about Google's wellbeing. I pay directly to the content creators I like and I hate seeing ads anywhere in my life and I'm willing to put in time and effort to make sure I see as few as possible.

If they say that the marketing data they scrape from user activity isn't enough for em, well, sucks to suck I guess.

[–] TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For someone who doesn't care and has no viable responses to the questions here, you sure do have a lot to say.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

It's true, I'm very passionate about never viewing any advertisements!

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reason I don't bring them revenue is because they continue to make the experience worse. Paying isn't going to make that stop, it's just going to temporarily shift the bar a little; the bar is however still moving towards a shittier experience for all.

Why would I look at this and go "Yes, I'll pay!" There are a lot of services I would genuinely pay for if I didn't have an impending dread that the service is just about to get worse again regardless of if I pay or not. It's not like paying is a magic bullet, either, it comes with a ton of different issues like privacy. They still sell your soul to advertisers if you pay them.

[–] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ultimately, they have no obligation to provide you something of value for free, and given that you do apparently use YouTube, they are objectively providing you something of value. They're completely within their rights to not do that.

[–] drkt@feddit.dk 7 points 1 year ago

I'll gloss over that you either missed my point or ignored it; I don't use YouTube because it's too shit, actually.

I don't pay for any Google services, not that I'm using any with any consistency anymore, for the same reason that I don't use them anymore. Google cannot be trusted to provide a good service, paying costumer or not. If you punish me for using the free product, why would I ever trust you? Steam doesn't slap me across the face at every chance it gets when I don't spend money on their store for a long period of time, yet I have no issue paying for the games I do want to play despite piracy being completely risk-free by comparison.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That goes both ways. I can stop providing youtube with free content.

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you aren't getting paid for your content, they'd probably be glad to not have to host it anymore. Anyone with content where it's worth them hosting it is getting paid.

[–] roo@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

I paid for Lynda.com, and it could have easily taken in more business if YouTube wasn't working so hard for Google ads. There are a lot of paid (and free) services that suffer because of YouTubes ad-money business model.

Netflix could use the extra business. There are plenty of services failing to thrive while YouTube exists. Peertube would be wide open if YouTube went the way of most of Google's stable of apps. PeerTube is wide open even if YouTube doesn't go away anyway.

People genuinely hate ads. It's a high degree of enshitification. YouTube could divide into paid content and free content in a simple Freemium model.

Or, add third tier with ads, which any user can opt out of in the same way contributers can. I'd be happy to click subscribe on an ad free experience with less content available to me.

Or, add an option for a couple of free tier items per month, week, or day. Like Medium's business model.

It's not hard to stop sucking!

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

well its not my problem

load more comments (57 replies)
load more comments (96 replies)