this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

LocalLLaMA

3 readers
1 users here now

Community to discuss about Llama, the family of large language models created by Meta AI.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a_beautiful_rhind@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why didn't MS keep him and why did he even go back?

[–] fallingdowndizzyvr@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As Nadella spelled out. It doesn't matter to him whether Altman is in Microsoft or OpenAI. It's pretty much the same to Microsoft. OpenAI is well in Microsoft's orbit. It's defacto a Microsoft Company. Analyst have even referred to it as Microsoft's AI research lab. Since that's basically what it is. Which is what I heard is the reason that the old board staged the coup. Since they they thought that Altman was too close to Microsoft.

So to MS, it doesn't matter if he's in Microsoft's external AI dev lab or an internal one. It probably helps that he's at the external one with the regulators. With Microsoft's history of being hassled due to anti-trust by various governments, it probably helps that it's kept at OpenAI.

As for why Altman went back, it's his company. He built it. It's his baby. Why wouldn't he go back? Why did Job go back to Apple?

[–] Ansible32@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I hope Microsoft gets some antitrust action on this, the whole thing seems like it was an antitrust violation, basically Microsoft acquiring OpenAI without doing it on paper to get around required regulatory approvals.