Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D]AI Ethicists Sound the Alarm: What's Driving Their Call for Heavy Regulation? (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by Xeiristotle@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As AI's capabilities expand, so too do concerns about its ethical implications. At the forefront of this debate are AI ethicists, a growing group of experts who advocate for responsible AI development and deployment.

AI ethicists raise a range of concerns, including the potential for AI systems to perpetuate bias and discrimination, the lack of transparency and accountability in AI decision-making, and the risks of AI misuse for surveillance, manipulation, and autonomous warfare. In response to these concerns, many AI ethicists are calling for heavy regulation of AI technologies.

AI Ethicists Sound the Alarm: What's Driving Their Call for Heavy Regulation?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CactusOnFire@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It sounds like you answered your own question.

I care a lot about AI ethics, but I'm hearing a lot of murmurs that the current wave of US government regulation looks more like pro-trust policy-making as a way of sabotaging open source initiatives.

Inter-industry regulation (not legal, just union/organization policy) right now seems to show a firm stance against generative AI for art, but since I am not an actor or illustrator, I will withhold commenting on those.

[–] LanchestersLaw@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I think it looks like regulatory capture by design. The point of even the most optimistic AI safety regulation is to restrict access, usage, progress, and slow or disable a market-driven dynamic. Any outcome from an honest initiative talking the correct steps will look like regulatory capture to some.

load more comments (1 replies)