Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] Difference between CUDA and Tensor Cores (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by 3DHydroPrints@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

CUDA cores (or shader cores in general) have long been used to compute graphics. A very often used operation in computer graphics are matrix multiplications, just like in deep learning. Back in the days (AlexNet) NNs were computed using shader cores, but now have completely moved to be computed on Tensor cores. My question are:

Why have these workloads been seperated? (Yes obviously the tensor cores are more specialized and leave out a bunch of unnecessary operations, but how and why not integrate it into the CUDA cores to boost MM operations for computer graphics?)
Why isn't the workload offloaded to the other cores when the mathematical operations are the same
What makes tensor cores so much more efficient and faster?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] VirtualHat@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This big difference with tensor cores is that they use a 16-bit float multiply combined with a 32-bit float accumulate. This makes them much more efficient in terms of transistors required... but not a swap in replacement for CUDA.

Libraries like Pytorch can do matrix multiply (MM) on both CUDA cores and Tensor cores (and CPU, too, if you like). Typically Tensor cores are ~1.5-2x faster (in theory they're much faster, in practice we're often memory bandwidth limited so it doesn't matter). The current default in Pytorch is to perform MM on CUDA, and convolutions on Tensor cores. The reason being that MM sometimes requires extra precision, and in vision models, most of the work is in the convolutions anyway.

[–] Buddy77777@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why use 32-bit accumulator to accumulate 16-bit numbers?

[–] wen_mars@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

If you multiply two 16-bit numbers the result can overflow the range that can be represented by 16 bits.

load more comments (1 replies)